At 11:03 07.04.99 -0700, Chris Newman wrote:
I'd like to move the "ancillary" disposition type (formerly
"metadata") to proposed status. This was discussed at the mailrev BOF.
Any final comments on the specification?
<ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-newman-mime-cdisp-metadata-02.txt>
- Chris
I still think that content-disposition is an inferior approach to
those based on multipart/related; the disposition is part of a bodypart's
context, not part of the bodypart itself.
But I recognize that this battle is lost, and support moving ahead with
this specification; in our current situation, this is the useful thing to do.
Go ahead!
Harald A
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Maxware, Norway
Harald(_dot_)Alvestrand(_at_)maxware(_dot_)no