Re: Alternative multipart/alternative?1999-09-13 06:37:46Did somebody once propose an modified form of multipart/alternative, with reversed ordering of the alternative parts (i.e. high-to-low fidelity rather than the standard low-to-high)? in the absence of a mechansim to know whether the recipient could handle such a construct, what would be the point? (and if you had such a mechanism, you could dispense with multipart/ alternative altogether)
|
|