Re: reason for application/iotp-xml

Dan Kohn writes:

These subtypes need to be under
existing top-level types in order to be dispatched correctly.


You're saying that application/iotp-xml can be dispatched correctly
while xml/iotp can't? Please explain.

---Dan

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Dan Kohn Re: reason for application/iotp-xml, D. J. Bernstein <= RE: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Scott Lawrence Re: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Keith Moore Re: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), ned . freed Re: reason for application/iotp-xml, D. J. Bernstein Re: reason for application/iotp-xml, Keith Moore RE: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), ned . freed RE: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Graham Klyne Re: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Keith Moore Compromises on XML Media Types (was Re: reason for application/iotp-xml), Simon St.Laurent RE: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Dan Kohn