Re: Statistics of "intelligence" in e-mail spams

ietf-822

2001-01-26 15:21:46

moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu (Keith Moore)  wrote on 22.01.01 in 
<200101221856(_dot_)NAA20373(_at_)astro(_dot_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu>:

My statistics thus supports the idea that spammers are getting
more intelligent.


or at least, the folks who are writing spam software are getting
more intelligent.


Or perhaps more precisely, the more "intelligent" spam tools gain  
marketshare.


MfG Kai

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Allowing MTAs to split messages to different recipients, (continued) Re: Allowing MTAs to split messages to different recipients, Jacob Palme Re: Allowing MTAs to split messages to different recipients, Keith Moore Re: Allowing MTAs to split messages to different recipients, Harald Alvestrand Re: Allowing MTAs to split messages to different recipients, ned . freed Stopping spam - is it possible?, Jacob Palme Re: Stopping spam - is it possible?, ned . freed Re: Stopping spam - is it possible?, James M Galvin Statistics of "intelligence" in e-mail spams, Jacob Palme Re: Statistics of "intelligence" in e-mail spams, James M Galvin Re: Statistics of "intelligence" in e-mail spams, Keith Moore Re: Statistics of "intelligence" in e-mail spams, Kai Henningsen <= Re: Stopping spam - is it possible?, Harald Alvestrand Re: Allowing MTAs to split messages to different recipients, D. J. Bernstein Re: Allowing MTAs to split messages to different recipients, Harald Alvestrand

Previous by Date:	Re: WG: Limitation in bcc-field of emails?, Kai Henningsen
Next by Date:	Re: Allowing MTAs to split messages to different recipients, Kai Henningsen
Previous by Thread:	Re: Statistics of "intelligence" in e-mail spams, Keith Moore
Next by Thread:	Re: Stopping spam - is it possible?, Harald Alvestrand
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]