fw(_at_)deneb(_dot_)enyo(_dot_)de (Florian Weimer) wrote on 06.12.01 in
<87itbk7z29(_dot_)fsf(_at_)deneb(_dot_)enyo(_dot_)de>:
kaih(_at_)khms(_dot_)westfalen(_dot_)de (Kai Henningsen) writes:
fw(_at_)deneb(_dot_)enyo(_dot_)de (Florian Weimer) wrote on 02.12.01 in
<871yidh4mk(_dot_)fsf(_at_)deneb(_dot_)enyo(_dot_)de>:
The source routing syntax in RFC 2822 differs considerably from
RFC 822. Is this intentional?
It does? How?
RFC 822 route-addr: <@host1(_at_)host2:user(_at_)target>
Wrong. # describes a comma-separated list. See 2.7.
RFC 2822 obs-angle-addr: <@host1(_at_)host2:user(_at_)target>
<@host1,@host2:user(_at_)target>
<@host1 @host2:user(_at_)target>
<@host1,,@host2:user(_at_)target>
True; I don't remember seeing that part discussed, but I expect it was to
match some frequent misspellings. You just demonstrated why that might be
necessary, by your misreading of 822.
MfG Kai