Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 07:38:43 -0500
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
[...]
>On the other hand, if the
>sender is not expecting an automatically generated reply, but is expecting
>a reply from a human (as in a "out of the office" response) then sending
>to the return-path address usually makes more sense.
no.
The Sieve vacation draft (now expired) explicitly mandates that the
vacation response messages be sent to the envelope from address
("Return-path"). In practice, we haven't had any complaints about
this behavior.
We do receive complaints about the check for the recipient's address
in the To/Cc header lines.
Larry