At 01:58 PM 6/3/2002 -0400, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
The Sieve vacation draft (now expired) explicitly mandates that the
vacation response messages be sent to the envelope from address
("Return-path"). In practice, we haven't had any complaints about
this behavior.
I suspect you haven't been sampling adequately. Most of the people I know
are quite irritated with getting such notices, unless they have explicitly
cited the recipient in To or CC.
At any rate, such a specification should be done as an extension to 2822,
rather than as a part of sieve. The issue goes beyond split-UA interactions.
We do receive complaints about the check for the recipient's address
in the To/Cc header lines.
Complaints from whom? The people who get vacation notices when they send
to a mailing list?
d/
----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850