Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail

Not NNTP.  The NNTP RFC was published before there were any real
implementations, which is one of the reasons why it has so many flaws that
later had to be corrected in practice.


thanks for correcting my mis-impression.  

though it's certainly possible for protocols that are widely deployed prior 
to being published to have large numbers of flaws also ...

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, (continued) Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, ned+ietf-822 RE: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Dan Wing Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Charles Lindsey Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Keith Moore Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Keith Moore Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Russ Allbery Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Charles Lindsey Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Keith Moore Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Russ Allbery Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Keith Moore <= Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Russ Allbery Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Keith Moore RE: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Dan Kohn Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Charles Lindsey Re: I-D Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail, Tony Hansen