ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

X- fields (Re: Getting 2822 to Draft)

2004-02-26 09:43:56

Keith Moore wrote:

Start saying things like that and you'll only encourage me to write
the "X- considered harmful" document. ;-)


and if you do, I'll write the "X- considered wonderful" document :)

actually I think we could probably find a compromise position that we
could agree on, as long as we don't make it part of the critical path
for more important work.

I just skimmed RFC 3692, which appears to be such a document (though
not specifically addressing X- fields).

#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################
#####
#####
#####
#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • X- fields (Re: Getting 2822 to Draft), Bruce Lilly <=