Re: Message Attributes (considered harmful)
2004-12-17 08:18:31
Keith Moore writes:
what we need IMHO is something akin to an annotation facility in IMAP
and/or POP, that stores the annotations separately from the actual
message.
Strongly agree.
IMAP has such a facility as a draft (with implementation experience).
POP has nothing AFAIK. Webmail services have whatever they want to
implement.
So, any mail server which offers multiple access vectors can provide
access to the same annotations via each protocol.
Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Message Attributes, (continued)
- Re: Message Attributes, Charles Lindsey
- Re: Message Attributes (considered harmful), Keith Moore
- Re: Message Attributes (considered harmful), Laird Breyer
- Re: Message Attributes (considered harmful), Keith Moore
- Re: Message Attributes (considered harmful),
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: Message Attributes (considered harmful), Cyrus Daboo
- Re: Message Attributes (considered harmful), Laird Breyer
- Re: Message Attributes (considered harmful), Keith Moore
- Re: Message Attributes (considered harmful), Laird Breyer
- Re: Message Attributes (considered harmful), Keith Moore
- Re: Message Attributes (considered harmful?), Jacob Palme
- Re: Message Attributes (considered harmful), Laird Breyer
- Origins of message modification, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Origins of message modification, Tony Finch
- Re: Origins of message modification, Arnt Gulbrandsen
|
|
|