On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Keith Moore wrote:
if anonymous(_at_)[] doesn't quite work, there are similar alternatives worth
considering. among them are: anonymous(_at_)[0(_dot_)0(_dot_)0(_dot_)0],
anonymous(_at_)[127(_dot_)0(_dot_)0(_dot_)1],
anonymous(_at_)[127(_dot_)255(_dot_)255(_dot_)255], anonymous(_at_)[::0], and
anonymous(_at_)[::1].
These might be OK in the message header. In the envelope they are likely
to be rejected as invalid, because many sites put restrictions on the use
of domain literals, and checks on envelope addresses tend to be more
thorough. In addition to that, many sites reject domains that do not refer
to globally routable addresses.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
LOUGH FOYLE TO CARLINGFORD LOUGH: SOUTHWEST VEERING NORTHWEST 4 OR 5 TODAY,
THEN BACKING WEST 5 OR 6 IN EVENING BEFORE VEERING NORTH OR NORTHWEST 4 OR 5
TONIGHT. RAIN TODAY, WINTRY SHOWERS TONIGHT. MODERATE OR GOOD. SLIGHT BECOMING
MODERATE LATER TODAY AND THEN MAINLY ROUGH TONIGHT.