In <200503010824(_dot_)24367(_dot_)blilly(_at_)erols(_dot_)com> Bruce Lilly
<blilly(_at_)erols(_dot_)com> writes:
On Mon February 28 2005 08:07, Charles Lindsey wrote:
So we can consider how those requirements are met in the 4 cases:
1. No From 2. blah.invalid 3. @[] 4. From <>
A. delivery 98% [1] 100% 98% 98%
[...]
Clearly, this analysis shows that no solution is going to be perfect (but
we knew that already). OTOH, it does seem to shown that #1 has worse
problems than the others.
What it shows is that you can start from preconceived notions,
make up a bunch of random numbers unrelated to any sort of
testing or scientific basis, then say "See, it shows I was right".
Bollocks.
There speaks a man whose mind is made up, and who does not wish to be
confused by the facts.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave,
CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5