On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:49:43 -0500, Bruce Lilly wrote:
have made some fairly minor changes to the "simplified"
RFC 2822 grammar at
your work falls into the category of "sure wish we had had access to it 10
in order to incorporate abnf changes to rfc2822 at this point, we would have to
re-cycle the specification at Proposed, because the abnf would be new and --
inherently - unstable.
The reading of the community is that it would rather advance the existing work
than start over learning to work with the new ABNF, no matter how well done the
new abnf might be.
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net