In <6bb609560503211135629587de(_at_)mail(_dot_)gmail(_dot_)com> Bart Schaefer
<barton(_dot_)schaefer(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> writes:
On Mon, 21 Mar 1005 12:49:06 +0000, Lindsey <Charles> wrote:
Message inserted directly at port 25 of mail.imc.org.
Came through to gmail with From: header intact.
Received: from clerew.man.ac.uk ([212.15.83.148])
by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j2LEBVYw032021
for <ietf-822(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:12:09 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from postmaster(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk)
Message-Id:
<200503211412(_dot_)j2LEBVYw032021(_at_)above(_dot_)proper(_dot_)com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1005 12:49:06 +0000
Subject: Test with From <> (3)
From: Charles Lindsey <>
Reply-To: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk
To: ietf-822(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
OK, so I seemed to have managed to get this test case past the list
expander at imc.org, so we can wee what it does on a variety of routes
after that (but my example with no From field at all seems to have been
eaten at imc).
So, the first question is:
IS THERE ANYBODY WHO DID NOT RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE AT ALL?
(Have to hold my own hand up here, but I shall poke around to see it it
was lost on my system or whether Spamassassin ate it, or something).
I have recived 5 reports of successful arrival with the From: line
received as sent. There were two reports of mangled display by reading
agents:
From: Lindsey <Charles>
From: Unknown <unknown(_at_)unknown(_dot_)
Neither of which are show stoppers, since both were rendered as sent when
"full headers" was called for.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave,
CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5