In <IDrFpC(_dot_)38L(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> "Charles Lindsey"
<chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> writes:
Message-Id:
<200503211412(_dot_)j2LEBVYw032021(_at_)above(_dot_)proper(_dot_)com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1005 12:49:06 +0000
Subject: Test with From <> (3)
From: Charles Lindsey <>
Reply-To: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk
To: ietf-822(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
OK, so I seemed to have managed to get this test case past the list
expander at imc.org, so we can wee what it does on a variety of routes
after that (but my example with no From field at all seems to have been
eaten at imc).
So, the first question is:
IS THERE ANYBODY WHO DID NOT RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE AT ALL?
(Have to hold my own hand up here, but I shall poke around to see it it
was lost on my system or whether Spamassassin ate it, or something).
On poking around in my logs, it was due to the bad Date header. I gateway
this list into a local news group, and CNews is very hot on discarding
news articles with bad syntax.
Pete Hoffman has now subscribed <> and <-(_at_)[]> to the list, so these should
now be reaching you. The (4) series also had a typo in the Date header, so
the (5) series is about to go out (one with no From and one with From
<-(_at_)[]>). Please report if you fail to receives these, or if they arrive
with "interesting" manglements.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave,
CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5