On Tue, 31 May 2005, Charles Lindsey wrote:
Which is why there needs to be a standard to declare exactly what
it is supposed to do and not to do.
Yes, but just conceptually it's quite a broad concept.
Given the current state of things wrt Reply-To and MUA behaviour i
think "Do no harm" should be a major factor. Adding scope for further
ambiguity and/or diverging MUA behaviour is worse than present
situation.
Sure. But a proper MFT standard would state clearly who the reply
was to go to (subject to user override) in all the possible
combinations of List-Post fields, MFT fields, Reply-To fields, etc
that could arise.
Given previous discussion, it seems unlikely it could ever become a
standard header though.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul(_at_)clubi(_dot_)ie paul(_at_)jakma(_dot_)org
Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
The poetry of heroism appeals irresitably to those who don't go to a war,
and even more so to those whom the war is making enormously wealthy."
-- Celine