On Mon, 30 May 2005, Charles Lindsey wrote:
Does it really allow you to set the Reply-To field according to the
"role"?
Yes it does.
With the caveat that at present it doesn't allow multi-mailbox
Reply-To's to be set. I intend to nag on the Pine list to try get
that fixed.
Certainly, the intention wrt Mail-Followup-To was that
users could set something like those "roles", but in a manner that
generated a MFT field depedong on the "role".
Sure, I could do that.
But that's very configuration intensive. (Just as for the Reply-To
solution). "I like to be copied on wide-replies" tends to be a global
preference, it shouldn't need per-list configuration - just something
you set once in your MUA and leave be (maybe on very rare occassions
editing the header when composing an email, when it doesnt suit).
I'd still love a Foo-Copy-Me type header, much easier and clearer.
But seems I wont get it. :(
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul(_at_)clubi(_dot_)ie paul(_at_)jakma(_dot_)org
Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Contemptuous lights flashed flashed across the computer's console.
-- Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy