Re: 2822bis and ""@example.org

Bruce Lilly writes:
> ""@[]
>
> is also valid, as discussed here some time ago (beginning September 
> 30, 2002).
> I seem to recall that you participated in that discussion...
You're perfectly right, and upon rereading the thread, my opinion seems 
a sensible one. On the whole, though, I found this posting from you 
persuasive:
http://www.imc.org/ietf-822/mail-archive/msg02502.html
and I'm sorry I did not say so at the time.

Arnt