In <20070726204813(_dot_)GL4619(_at_)apb-laptoy(_dot_)apb(_dot_)alt(_dot_)za>
Alan Barrett <apb(_at_)cequrux(_dot_)com> writes:
The intent behind my suggested wording is to make it more clear to
software vendors that the domain name on the right hand side of the
message-id is allowed to be the vendor's domain name; that it doesn't
have to be the domain name of the host that's running the software, and
that inability to know the domain name of the host is not necessarily a
problem.
There is indeed one well known vendor which does what you say, but I am not
sure whether it is a practice we want to encourage (that is not to say
that vendor is likely to be swayed by such non-encouragement).
Essentially, such vendors have to rely on generating a sufficiently long
random number for the id-left to make it astronomically improbable that a
clash will occur. We mght have some discussion as to whether we regard
that as a good method worthy of our blessing.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave,
CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5