Pete Resnick wrote:
things by showing only that line. Here's the new wording of the entire
note:
Note: The transmitter information is always present. The absence of the
"Sender:" field is sometimes mistakenly taken to mean that the agent
responsible for transmission of the message has not been specified. The
absence of the "Sender:" field merely means that the transmitter is
identical to the author and is therefore not redundantly placed into a
separate field.
+1
d/
ps. my motivation for pursuing this issue is that, in effect, I want to
highlight that the agent responsible for posting really has been stated
"explicitly". But it merely has not be coded "differentially"...
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net