ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-822] draft-crocker-inreply-react-- header field approach

2020-10-23 15:49:49
In article <B22C9047AFA80CCBCDED0FF6@PSB> you write:
(1) I haven't tried to do a careful study of MUAs in years and
the one I use most often is even older, but what I keep seeing
when looking over the shoulders of others is that MUAs display
the headers they recognize and think are important. ...

Agreed. Most of my mail has a non-standard Cleverness: header. How
many people reading this have ever seen it? Rather few I would guess.

(3) Several of the systems I've looked at (including both
assorted filters and MUAs) don't deal kindly with messages with
empty bodies.  Even when  they are delivered, they may be
presented with obnoxious warnings.

Yup.

I'm inclined to agree with Ned that Content-Type is correct but that
Content-Disposition is more likely to work.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
ietf-822 mailing list
ietf-822(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>