Kee Hinckley wrote:
Keith Moore writes:
that and for the purpose of this discussion it's probably sufficient
if we
classify a few kinds of things that analysis tools look for (e.g.
originator
characteristics, signal path, gross message characteristics, specific
items in the content) and some of the kinds of filtering that are done
based
on the analysis (e.g. discard, bounce, alter, delay, require
confirmation)
General characteristics would be nice. However I know some companies
will balk at providing too much detail about what characteristics they
examine. However it would be useful to have some list of attributes.
Our experience with most spam repositories has been that they assume
content-filtering, and have so emasculated the headers that
non-content-filtering solutions can't use them at all.
We're archiving somewhere in the neighborhood of 300K-400K spams per
day. No munging. I'm sure something can be arranged.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg