On Monday, April 7, 2003, at 12:35 PM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
That is equally clueless since there is prior art to 1992 when the
challenge/response was used at MIT for the Clinton/Gore 92 Online
Campaign.
However it is one of those cases where a patent does have a positive
social value by eliminating a technology that needs elimination.
It's only clueless until people decide it's cheaper to license than to
fight. But that's off-topic for here, so I won't pursue it.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg