IRTF Anti-spam Research Group (date)
[
Thread Index
]
[
Top
]
[
All Lists
]
<
Prev Period
]
[
Advanced
]
[
Next Period
>
April 30, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
20:36
Re: So what's the *right* way to be a bulkmailer? (Was RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS)
,
wayne
,
20:12
[Asrg] Changing mailing lists from push to pull
,
waltdnes
,
20:00
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
mathew
,
19:36
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
18:57
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
J C Lawrence
,
17:36
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
J C Lawrence
,
17:09
RE: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
16:28
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Markus Stumpf
,
15:39
Re: [Asrg] at: list moderator
,
Larry Marks
,
15:33
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Barry Shein
,
15:08
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Barry Shein
,
14:56
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
14:56
Re: [Asrg] at: list moderator
,
scott
,
14:32
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Markus Stumpf
,
14:23
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
J C Lawrence
,
14:19
[Asrg] License to Send
,
Bob Wyman
,
14:14
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Barry Shein
,
14:09
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:48
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Alan DeKok
,
13:39
[Asrg] at: list moderator
,
matthew richards
,
13:29
[Asrg] Domain-Authorized SMTP Mail
,
David Green
,
13:28
[Asrg] OT? Governor Warner Signs Toughest in the Nation Anti-"SPAM" Bill
,
Markus Stumpf
,
13:27
RE: [Asrg] Technical Considerations for Spam Control Mechanisms
,
Bob Wyman
,
13:19
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Barry Shein
,
13:19
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:45
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
11:58
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Vernon Schryver
,
11:51
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
11:51
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
11:48
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
11:08
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Claus Assmann
,
10:49
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:07
RE: [Asrg] Technical Considerations for Spam Control Mechanisms
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:51
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Simpson
,
09:34
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
09:15
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Scott Nelson
,
09:06
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
08:48
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Kee Hinckley
,
08:28
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
08:13
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
08:08
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
07:58
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Simpson
,
07:38
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:07
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:02
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
mathew
,
06:27
Re: [Asrg] NNTP IS Pull, deal with it
,
mathew
,
06:05
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
05:50
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
04:29
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
00:45
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
J C Lawrence
,
00:22
April 29, 2003
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Andrzej Filip
,
23:52
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
J C Lawrence
,
22:56
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
22:25
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Kee Hinckley
,
22:22
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Kee Hinckley
,
22:12
RE: [Asrg] News: MSFT/AOL/YHOO anti-spam joint effort announced
,
Eric D. Williams
,
21:51
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
J C Lawrence
,
21:27
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Kee Hinckley
,
20:41
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Vernon Schryver
,
20:27
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
John Fenley
,
20:08
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:57
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:51
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
waltdnes
,
18:34
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:23
Re: [Asrg] hot fix
,
wayne
,
18:17
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Kee Hinckley
,
17:58
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
17:31
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
17:31
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
17:31
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:17
Re: So what's the *right* way to be a bulkmailer? (Was RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS)
,
Barry Shein
,
16:05
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:55
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:48
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:25
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:17
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:59
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:56
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:55
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:55
Re: So what's the *right* way to be a bulkmailer? (Was RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:55
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:20
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
14:17
Re: So what's the *right* way to be a bulkmailer? (Was RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS)
,
Barry Shein
,
14:10
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:04
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Kee Hinckley
,
13:48
So what's the *right* way to be a bulkmailer? (Was RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
13:48
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Barry Shein
,
13:24
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
12:52
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
12:51
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:32
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Andrzej Filip
,
12:16
Re: [Asrg] 25th anniversary of Spam
,
Brad Templeton
,
11:53
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Justin Mason
,
11:50
Re: [Asrg] OMPUAC
,
Justin Mason
,
11:41
Re: [Asrg] hot fix
,
matthew richards
,
11:29
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
wayne
,
11:15
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
10:36
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:32
Re: [Asrg] 25th anniversary of Spam
,
wayne
,
10:31
[Asrg] Spam corpus for tests
,
Alan DeKok
,
10:00
Re: [Asrg] OMPUAC
,
wayne
,
09:59
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
wayne
,
09:56
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Andrzej Filip
,
09:51
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
wayne
,
09:45
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Andrzej Filip
,
09:35
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Vernon Schryver
,
09:35
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
J C Lawrence
,
09:15
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Larry Marks
,
09:11
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Larry Marks
,
09:07
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Jim Youll
,
09:05
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Jon Kyme
,
08:53
Re: [Asrg] Technical Considerations for Spam Control Mechanisms
,
Liudvikas Bukys
,
08:45
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
08:36
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:04
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Alan DeKok
,
08:03
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Jim Youll
,
07:59
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
07:48
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Jon Kyme
,
07:47
RE: [Asrg] 25th anniversary of Spam
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
07:40
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Vernon Schryver
,
06:49
Re: [Asrg] Technical Considerations for Spam Control Mechanisms
,
Dave Crocker
,
06:30
Re: [Asrg] 25th anniversary of Spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
06:27
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Vernon Schryver
,
06:23
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
06:23
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Vernon Schryver
,
06:09
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Jim Youll
,
06:02
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Vernon Schryver
,
06:02
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Jon Kyme
,
05:32
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Kee Hinckley
,
04:57
[Asrg] PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE
,
Doug Starke
,
04:55
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Andrzej Filip
,
04:46
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Peter J. Holzer
,
04:02
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:57
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
John Fenley
,
01:34
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Andrzej Filip
,
01:33
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Andrzej Filip
,
01:32
[Asrg] 25th anniversary of Spam
,
Brad Templeton
,
01:07
Re: [Asrg] OMPUAC
,
waltdnes
,
00:27
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
waltdnes
,
00:04
April 28, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Scott Nelson
,
23:33
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
J C Lawrence
,
22:56
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
waltdnes
,
22:50
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
wayne
,
22:35
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
J C Lawrence
,
22:00
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
21:49
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
21:46
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
21:46
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
waltdnes
,
21:46
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Vernon Schryver
,
20:40
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Vernon Schryver
,
20:21
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Kee Hinckley
,
20:07
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:59
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Barry Shein
,
19:24
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Larry Marks
,
19:18
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Olson, Margaret
,
19:06
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Larry Marks
,
19:03
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Larry Marks
,
19:03
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
19:03
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:40
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:40
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:21
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Olson, Margaret
,
18:17
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:17
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Shannon Jacobs
,
18:14
RE: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
17:48
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Kee Hinckley
,
17:35
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
wayne
,
17:35
RE: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
17:35
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
J C Lawrence
,
17:31
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Jim Youll
,
17:27
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Olson, Margaret
,
16:46
Re: [Asrg] ??? E-Mail Service Providers Unite in Bid to Stop Spam ???
,
wayne
,
16:13
RE: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
15:21
RE: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
15:06
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:05
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:01
Re: [Asrg] OMPUAC
,
Jim Youll
,
14:57
RE: [Asrg] OMPUAC
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
14:52
Re: [Asrg] ??? E-Mail Service Providers Unite in Bid to Stop Spam ???
,
Markus Stumpf
,
14:39
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:39
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
14:38
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:12
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:59
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
13:59
Re: [Asrg] hot fix
,
wayne
,
13:32
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Larry Marks
,
13:22
[Asrg] OMPUAC
,
Chris Lewis
,
12:48
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
12:46
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Chris Lewis
,
12:43
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:15
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
12:05
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Alan DeKok
,
11:56
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:54
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
11:53
RE: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
11:53
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Larry Marks
,
11:45
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:39
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Larry Marks
,
11:34
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Peter J. Holzer
,
11:31
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC Proposal)
,
Chris Lewis
,
11:29
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
11:18
[Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
11:16
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
11:12
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Jon Kyme
,
11:02
[Asrg] hot fix
,
matthew richards
,
10:47
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:39
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Alan DeKok
,
10:39
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Larry Marks
,
10:35
[Asrg] article: Stupid spammer reveals lots of info
,
wayne
,
09:51
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:50
Re: [Asrg] News: MSFT/AOL/YHOO anti-spam joint effort announced
,
wayne
,
09:46
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
J C Lawrence
,
09:25
[Asrg] free provider drop-boxes
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:25
Re: [Asrg] ??? E-Mail Service Providers Unite in Bid to Stop Spam ???
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:46
RE: [Asrg] ??? E-Mail Service Providers Unite in Bid to Stop Spam ???
,
Bob Wyman
,
07:39
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
07:18
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Jon Kyme
,
06:12
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Larry Marks
,
05:12
[Asrg] News: MSFT/AOL/YHOO anti-spam joint effort announced
,
Jim Youll
,
05:08
[Asrg] ??? E-Mail Service Providers Unite in Bid to Stop Spam ???
,
Jon Kyme
,
04:18
Re: [Asrg] Technical Considerations for Spam Control Mechanisms
,
Jon Kyme
,
03:15
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Jon Kyme
,
02:03
April 27, 2003
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
J C Lawrence
,
20:39
Re: [Asrg] Whitelists, Blacklists, Greylists, and Challenge/Response
,
J C Lawrence
,
20:33
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
J C Lawrence
,
20:24
RE: [Asrg] Technical Considerations for Spam Control Mechanisms
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
20:07
RE: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Tom Betz
,
20:00
[Asrg] Technical Considerations for Spam Control Mechanisms
,
Dave Crocker
,
19:43
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Scott Nelson
,
19:42
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:15
RE: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:12
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Chris Lewis
,
18:58
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC Proposal)
,
waltdnes
,
18:52
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Scott Nelson
,
18:31
RE: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Olson, Margaret
,
18:17
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
waltdnes
,
17:28
RE: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
16:50
Re: [Asrg] Whitelists, Blacklists, Greylists, and Challenge/Response
,
waltdnes
,
16:48
Re: [Asrg] What this?
,
waltdnes
,
16:42
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
16:42
RE: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:38
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
J C Lawrence
,
16:13
RE: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
15:11
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Mark Delany
,
14:49
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Andrzej Filip
,
14:15
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
wayne
,
13:34
RE: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:12
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC Proposal)
,
Jeffrey Race
,
12:56
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:53
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC Proposal)
,
wayne
,
12:36
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Andrzej Filip
,
11:40
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Chris Lewis
,
11:23
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
wayne
,
10:48
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
10:47
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:33
[Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC Proposal)
,
Nathaniel Borenstein
,
10:32
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
wayne
,
10:08
RE: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
10:05
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:05
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Vernon Schryver
,
09:45
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Scott Nelson
,
09:39
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Jon Kyme
,
09:35
RE: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:05
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Jon Kyme
,
08:58
RE: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
07:59
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Mark Delany
,
07:47
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:24
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:01
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Vernon Schryver
,
06:46
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
06:43
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Justin Mason
,
05:06
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Scott Nelson
,
01:09
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
J C Lawrence
,
00:48
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Chris Lewis
,
00:11
Re: [Asrg] NNTP IS Pull, deal with it
,
Chris Lewis
,
00:01
April 26, 2003
Re: [Asrg] NNTP IS Pull, deal with it
,
Chris Lewis
,
23:57
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Chris Lewis
,
23:32
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Larry Marks
,
22:58
Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Vernon Schryver
,
22:52
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Steven F Siirila
,
21:32
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
J C Lawrence
,
21:23
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Andrzej Filip
,
21:20
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
J C Lawrence
,
21:17
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Steven F Siirila
,
21:08
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
J C Lawrence
,
21:06
RE: [Asrg] What this?
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
20:04
Re: [Asrg] NNTP IS Pull, deal with it
,
wayne
,
19:54
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
19:53
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Larry Marks
,
19:46
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Steven F Siirila
,
19:12
Re: [Asrg] What this?
,
waltdnes
,
18:54
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:54
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
18:22
RE: [Asrg] NNTP IS Pull, deal with it
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:16
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:13
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:06
Re: [Asrg] Whitelists, Blacklists, Greylists, and Challenge/Response
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:04
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
wayne
,
17:37
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS
,
wayne
,
17:22
RE: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
John Fenley
,
16:57
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:29
RE: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Gordon Fecyk
,
16:25
RE: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
16:16
Re: [Asrg] The spammers strike back
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:16
RE: [Asrg] NNTP IS Pull, deal with it
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
16:12
Re: [Asrg] NNTP IS Pull, deal with it
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:06
[Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Scott Nelson
,
16:02
RE: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:00
RE: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Olson, Margaret
,
15:06
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Alan DeKok
,
14:50
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Alan DeKok
,
14:36
Re: [Asrg] NNTP IS Pull, deal with it
,
Alan DeKok
,
14:35
[Asrg] The spammers strike back
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
14:35
RE: [Asrg] Organizing the ASRG list
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
13:52
[Asrg] Whitelists, Blacklists, Greylists, and Challenge/Response
,
waltdnes
,
13:43
Re: [Asrg] Organizing the ASRG list
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:14
Re: [Asrg] Organizing the ASRG list
,
Neale Pickett
,
13:11
Re: [Asrg] Organizing the ASRG list
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:42
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:34
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Jim Youll
,
12:29
Re: [Asrg] NNTP IS Pull, deal with it
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:05
Re: [Asrg] Organizing the ASRG list
,
Vernon Schryver
,
11:32
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Kee Hinckley
,
11:17
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Kee Hinckley
,
11:17
[Asrg] NNTP IS Pull, deal with it
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
10:04
Re: [Asrg] Organizing the ASRG list
,
Dave Crocker
,
09:24
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:48
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
07:44
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:28
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:23
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:18
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
06:10
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Jim Youll
,
05:52
Re: RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Jon Kyme
,
00:31
April 25, 2003
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Vernon Schryver
,
21:18
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Vernon Schryver
,
21:06
RE: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Scott Nelson
,
20:57
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
20:24
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
20:23
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Jim Youll
,
20:20
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
20:16
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:41
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:38
RE: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:37
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
17:42
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:25
Re: [Asrg] Organizing the ASRG list
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:55
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
15:54
RE: [Asrg] Organizing the ASRG list
,
Paul Judge
,
15:35
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
matthew richards
,
15:01
[Asrg] memetic warfare to combat spam evolution
,
John Fenley
,
14:48
[Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
14:08
[Asrg] Organizing the ASRG list
,
Alan Maitland
,
14:07
RE: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
13:42
RE: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
scott
,
13:21
April 24, 2003
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
wayne
,
18:59
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:44
Re: [Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:24
[Asrg] ESPC Proposal
,
Kee Hinckley
,
12:56
[Asrg] What this?
,
Reinhold Jordan
,
01:55
Re: [Asrg] overlooking the obvious
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:25
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:08
April 23, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Jim Youll
,
15:05
Re: [Asrg] overlooking the obvious
,
Jim Youll
,
14:55
[Asrg] overlooking the obvious
,
matthew richards
,
14:44
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:06
[Asrg] The spammers strike back
,
Kee Hinckley
,
13:33
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Jon Kyme
,
12:47
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios [evidence for legal actions]
,
Andrzej Filip
,
11:21
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios [evidence for legal actions]
,
Andrzej Filip
,
11:20
Re: [Asrg] A Vaccine- not a cure or treatment- for Spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
10:22
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Kee Hinckley
,
10:21
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Jon Kyme
,
08:13
Re: [Asrg] A Vaccine- not a cure or treatment- for Spam (apologies for repost- typo fixed)
,
Jon Kyme
,
08:10
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios [evidence for legal actions]
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:51
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:51
RE: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:51
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios [evidence for legal actions]
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:38
Re: [Asrg] A Vaccine- not a cure or treatment- for Spam (apologies for repost- typo fixed)
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:01
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Dave Crocker
,
06:45
RE: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Jim Youll
,
06:40
Re: [Asrg] Regarding exploitation of bounces
,
Dave Crocker
,
06:23
RE: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Jim Youll
,
06:21
Re: [Asrg] A Vaccine- not a cure or treatment- for Spam
,
Jim Youll
,
06:19
RE: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
06:14
RE: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
06:02
[Asrg] Regarding exploitation of bounces
,
Jim Youll
,
05:31
Re: [Asrg] A Vaccine- not a cure or treatment- for Spam (apologies for repost- typo fixed)
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:40
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:17
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios [evidence for legal actions]
,
Andrzej Filip
,
00:59
April 22, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
J C Lawrence
,
21:17
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
J C Lawrence
,
20:53
Re: [Asrg] A Vaccine- not a cure or treatment- for Spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
20:25
Re: [Asrg] Accountability - AOL suing spammers
,
Kee Hinckley
,
20:24
RE: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Kee Hinckley
,
20:24
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Kee Hinckley
,
20:24
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios [evidence for legal actions]
,
Kee Hinckley
,
20:24
Re: [Asrg] The Problem is No Sender Liability
,
Kee Hinckley
,
20:24
RE: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Kee Hinckley
,
20:23
RE: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Kee Hinckley
,
20:23
Re: [Asrg] The Problem is No Sender Liability
,
Dave Crocker
,
18:45
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:37
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity y and scenarios
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:37
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:37
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:36
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:36
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:35
Re: [Asrg] The Problem is No Sender Liability
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:26
Re: [Asrg] Accountability - AOL suing spammers
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:26
[Asrg] A Vaccine- not a cure or treatment- for Spam (apologies for repost- typo fixed)
,
Murali Krishna Devarakonda
,
15:05
[Asrg] A Vaccine- not a cure or treatment- for Spam
,
Murali Krishna Devarakonda
,
14:58
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
14:54
[Asrg] The Problem is No Sender Liability
,
Jacob Muñoz
,
14:18
Re: [Asrg] Accountability - AOL suing spammers
,
Justin Mason
,
14:07
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:03
Re: [Asrg] Accountability - AOL suing spammers
,
Dave Crocker
,
13:49
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Dave Crocker
,
13:45
RE: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
13:26
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios [evidence for legal actions]
,
Andrzej Filip
,
13:21
RE: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Art Pollard
,
13:19
RE: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
13:18
RE: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Art Pollard
,
13:16
Re: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Kee Hinckley
,
13:10
RE: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Dave Hendricks
,
13:09
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Kee Hinckley
,
13:08
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:52
RE: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
12:26
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
12:26
RE: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
12:12
RE: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
12:12
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Dave Crocker
,
12:03
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Kee Hinckley
,
11:56
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Dave Crocker
,
11:54
RE: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
asrg
,
11:13
RE: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Art Pollard
,
11:11
RE: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
10:36
Re: [Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Art Pollard
,
10:33
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:27
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Jon Kyme
,
09:56
Re: [Asrg] (Off topic) How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Nathaniel Borenstein
,
09:55
Re: [Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Kee Hinckley
,
09:30
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:30
Re: [Asrg] LIMP: Local Interpretation of MX Priority
,
Claus Assmann
,
09:17
Re: [Asrg] LIMP: Local Interpretation of MX Priority
,
Alan DeKok
,
08:37
Re: [Asrg] LIMP: Local Interpretation of MX Priority
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:27
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Dave Crocker
,
08:20
RE: [Asrg] (Off topic) How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Tom Thomson
,
08:05
RE: [Asrg] 7 bit channels (off topic reply to off topic remarks)
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
07:44
RE: [Asrg] 7 bit channels (off topic reply to off topic remarks)
,
Tom Thomson
,
07:37
[Asrg] NYT article on spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:04
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Tom Thomson
,
07:02
Re: [Asrg] LIMP: Local Interpretation of MX Priority
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:01
[Asrg] Hello- and my 2 cents
,
Murali Krishna Devarakonda
,
02:22
April 21, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Andrzej Filip
,
23:15
Re: [Asrg] Other Groups Efforts
,
waltdnes
,
22:36
Re: [Asrg] LIMP: Local Interpretation of MX Priority
,
Vernon Schryver
,
20:10
Re: [Asrg] LIMP: Local Interpretation of MX Priority
,
Alan DeKok
,
18:35
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
waltdnes
,
17:35
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
waltdnes
,
17:19
Re: [Asrg] LIMP: Local Interpretation of MX Priority
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:53
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:42
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Justin Mason
,
14:11
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
13:59
Re: [Asrg] LIMP: Local Interpretation of MX Priority
,
Alan DeKok
,
13:57
Re: [Asrg] LIMP: Local Interpretation of MX Priority
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:45
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:32
[Asrg] LIMP: Local Interpretation of MX Priority
,
Alan DeKok
,
11:58
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Andrzej Filip
,
10:55
RE: [Asrg] Other Groups Efforts
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
10:30
[Asrg] Other Groups Efforts
,
Tom Bartel
,
09:50
Re: [Asrg] domain specific DNS blacklists (or whitelists) [2]
,
Steven F Siirila
,
09:19
RE: [Asrg] I want spam gone by the end of the year.
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:12
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:04
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:03
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:23
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:06
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:49
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Nathaniel Borenstein
,
06:41
Re: [Asrg] I want spam gone by the end of the year.
,
J C Lawrence
,
03:49
April 20, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Dave Crocker
,
23:32
Re: [Asrg] I want spam gone by the end of the year.
,
Dave Crocker
,
23:06
[Asrg] I want spam gone by the end of the year.
,
John Fenley
,
21:13
Re: [Asrg] domain specific DNS blacklists (or whitelists) [2]
,
David Walker
,
20:02
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
19:24
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
19:09
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
18:59
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
18:57
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:57
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity
,
Jamie Lawrence
,
17:09
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
,
J C Lawrence
,
17:00
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Dave Crocker
,
16:20
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:27
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ... and Gray list: rating of associates
,
mathew
,
14:41
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
mathew
,
14:33
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
,
John Fenley
,
14:17
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity
,
John Fenley
,
13:21
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
,
Alan DeKok
,
12:55
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Nathaniel Borenstein
,
12:22
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
11:39
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity
,
Jamie Lawrence
,
11:39
[Asrg] domain specific DNS blacklists (or whitelists) [2]
,
Andrzej Filip
,
11:35
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
11:32
[Asrg] Challenge to Challenge response
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
11:26
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
11:14
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity
,
John Fenley
,
10:46
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
,
John Fenley
,
10:23
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
,
Carl Ford
,
10:22
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity
,
Jamie Lawrence
,
10:00
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Nathaniel Borenstein
,
09:44
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
,
Alan DeKok
,
06:27
April 19, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
,
John Fenley
,
18:55
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Dave Crocker
,
18:26
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
,
Alan DeKok
,
16:39
RE: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
16:14
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:27
[Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
,
Dave Crocker
,
10:57
Re: [Asrg] Accountability - AOL suing spammers
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:45
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Dave Crocker
,
08:30
Re: [Asrg] Accountability - AOL suing spammers
,
Dave Crocker
,
08:00
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ... and Gray list: rating of associates
,
J C Lawrence
,
00:27
April 18, 2003
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ... and Gray list: rating of associates
,
Dave Lampert
,
22:03
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Larry Marks
,
08:00
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
waltdnes
,
06:04
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
waltdnes
,
06:02
April 17, 2003
Re: [Asrg] [Asr?g] Legal side track
,
John Fenley
,
11:23
Re: [Asrg] [Asr?g] Legal side track
,
John Fenley
,
10:34
RE: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Eric D. Williams
,
10:29
RE: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Tom Thomson
,
08:53
RE: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:48
Re: [Asrg] Accountability - AOL suing spammers
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:48
RE: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
White, Sam
,
07:42
[Asrg] 1. inventory of problems draft 2 (was: RE: [Asrg] Can we improve how spam gets *reported*?)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
06:44
RE: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Eric D. Williams
,
06:43
Re: [Asrg] draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Derek J. Balling
,
06:30
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
Jim Youll
,
06:10
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
Dr. Jeffrey Race
,
05:51
Re: RE: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
04:23
RE: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Tom Thomson
,
02:43
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
00:45
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
00:16
Re: [Asrg] Accountability - AOL suing spammers
,
Dave Crocker
,
00:15
April 16, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
Larry Marks
,
22:28
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Larry Marks
,
22:22
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
Jim Youll
,
20:41
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
waltdnes
,
20:22
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:30
Re: [Asrg] [Asr?g] Legal side track
,
waltdnes
,
19:16
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:59
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
waltdnes
,
18:43
[Asrg] Can we improve how spam gets *reported*?
,
Kee Hinckley
,
17:43
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
16:22
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
15:43
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
15:03
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
14:43
[Asrg] draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
13:25
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
Alan DeKok
,
11:34
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
11:28
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
10:32
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
10:13
Re: [Asrg] plus addressing
,
J C Lawrence
,
09:53
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
09:42
[Asrg] D'oh
,
Jon Kyme
,
09:36
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam (fwd)
,
Brad Spencer
,
09:11
RE: [Asrg] Accountability - AOL suing spammers
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:04
[Asrg] plus addressing
,
Russell-2asrg44all-
,
09:04
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
08:48
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
08:27
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:31
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:14
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:14
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Alan DeKok
,
06:50
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
Matt Sergeant
,
05:43
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
05:37
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
mathew
,
05:33
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
05:04
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam (fwd)
,
Jon Kyme
,
05:01
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
04:20
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
04:04
April 15, 2003
[Asrg] Accountability - AOL suing spammers
,
Jim Youll
,
20:15
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:58
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:17
Re: [Asrg] [Asr?g] Legal side track
,
John Fenley
,
19:08
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
18:28
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:21
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
Jim Youll
,
18:12
Re: [Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
John Fenley
,
18:11
[Asrg] Two options (was: Legal suggestions...)
,
waltdnes
,
17:44
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
John Fenley
,
17:33
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
John Fenley
,
17:17
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
waltdnes
,
16:49
Re: [Asrg] [Asr?g] Legal side track
,
waltdnes
,
16:17
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
waltdnes
,
16:01
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
15:53
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
John Fenley
,
14:06
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
13:51
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
John Fenley
,
13:50
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
09:58
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
09:13
Re: [asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
06:19
[asrg] 6. proposal of solution: Using Relay Honeypots to Reduce Spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
05:01
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
04:38
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Larry Marks
,
02:57
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Jon Kyme
,
02:20
April 14, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Steven G. Willis
,
21:26
Re: [Asrg] [Asr?g] Legal side track
,
John Fenley
,
21:02
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
John Fenley
,
20:45
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
waltdnes
,
20:14
Re: [Asrg] Note: Active harassment
,
Chris Lewis
,
19:55
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
waltdnes
,
19:52
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
waltdnes
,
19:47
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Peter J. Holzer
,
15:10
[Asrg] [Asr?g] Legal side track
,
John Fenley
,
12:54
[Asrg] I'm alive but busy...
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
12:07
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Michael Ellis
,
07:35
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Jim Youll
,
05:09
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
04:11
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Jon Kyme
,
02:44
April 13, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
J C Lawrence
,
22:07
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Steven G. Willis
,
21:16
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
21:14
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
J C Lawrence
,
21:06
Re: [Asrg] Note: Active harassment
,
J C Lawrence
,
20:56
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Steven G. Willis
,
18:55
[Asrg] Note: Active harassment
,
Jim Youll
,
18:18
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
John Fenley
,
18:02
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Richard Cox
,
15:04
April 12, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
waltdnes
,
18:36
RE: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:54
RE: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:42
RE: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:18
Re: [Asrg] Spam corpuses
,
mathew
,
06:35
RE: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
05:09
RE: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
05:02
RE: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
04:57
Re: [Asrg] 1. inventory of problems draft 2
,
Chris Lewis
,
01:14
Re: [Asrg] RE: [Asrg]2.b. Spam corpuses
,
Chris Lewis
,
01:11
April 11, 2003
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
20:35
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
19:15
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Scott Bellware
,
19:13
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
18:24
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
17:43
Re: FW: [Asrg] Anyone have the text on this bill?
,
Kee Hinckley
,
17:03
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Alan DeKok
,
16:52
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Scott Bellware
,
16:52
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
16:29
[Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
,
Art Pollard
,
16:07
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
15:04
Re: [Asrg] definition of spam
,
Alberto França
,
14:05
Re: FW: [Asrg] Anyone have the text on this bill?
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:01
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:35
Re: [Asrg] definition of spam
,
Alberto França
,
11:25
Re: FW: [Asrg] Anyone have the text on this bill?
,
Devereaux
,
11:09
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Jamie Lawrence
,
11:08
Re: [Asrg] RE: [Asrg]2.b. Spam corpuses
,
Justin Mason
,
10:40
[Asrg] Anyone have the text on this bill?
,
Kee Hinckley
,
10:32
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
09:54
Re: [Asrg] 1. inventory of problems draft 2
,
Kee Hinckley
,
09:49
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
09:49
Re: [Asrg] 1. inventory of problems draft 2
,
Brad Spencer
,
08:52
Re: [Asrg] Re: definition of spam at monkeys.com
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:34
Re: [Asrg] 1. inventory of problems draft 2
,
wayne
,
08:22
Re: [Asrg] 2.c.1 and 6 - The importance of being Earnest
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:25
[Asrg] Re: definition of spam at monkeys.com
,
Jim Youll
,
07:11
[Asrg] Re: definition of spam at monkeys.com
,
wayne
,
06:47
Re: [Asrg] 1. inventory of problems draft 2
,
Brad Spencer
,
06:40
Re: [Asrg] my idea
,
Kurt Magnusson
,
05:24
RE: [Asrg] [ASRG]Other Ideas?
,
Paul Judge
,
04:58
[Asrg] 1. inventory of problems draft 2
,
Paul Judge
,
04:45
[Asrg] RE: [Asrg]2.b. Spam corpuses
,
Paul Judge
,
04:43
Re: [Asrg] 2.c.1 and 6 - The importance of being Earnest
,
Kurt Magnusson
,
04:32
Re: [Asrg] [ASRG]Other Ideas?
,
Jon Kyme
,
04:09
April 10, 2003
Re: [Asrg] [ASRG]Other Ideas?
,
Kee Hinckley
,
21:26
Re: [Asrg] 5.b. opt-out, opt-in, and explicit consent
,
waltdnes
,
19:43
Re: [Asrg] Spam corpuses
,
J C Lawrence
,
19:42
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
19:31
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
19:30
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
19:14
[Asrg] Spam corpuses
,
Terri Oda
,
18:56
Re: [Asrg] [ASRG]Other Ideas?
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
18:42
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
18:41
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:11
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
17:27
Re: [Asrg] [ASRG]Other Ideas?
,
Brad Spencer
,
16:56
[Asrg] [ASRG]Other Ideas?
,
John Fenley
,
16:42
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
15:51
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:46
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
15:27
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
15:10
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
14:55
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
14:51
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:51
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
14:40
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
14:34
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
14:28
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
14:24
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
14:16
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:01
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
13:43
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
13:42
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
13:42
Re: [Asrg] 2.c.1 and 6 - The importance of being Earnest
,
Kee Hinckley
,
13:42
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Kee Hinckley
,
13:42
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:06
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:05
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
13:05
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Vulnerability)
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:05
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
12:56
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:56
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
12:45
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:41
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
12:38
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
12:35
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
12:30
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Vulnerability)
,
John Fenley
,
12:29
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
12:29
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
12:26
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:13
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:03
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:51
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
11:05
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
11:01
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
10:58
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
10:57
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
10:57
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:49
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
10:28
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:25
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:17
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:14
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:10
[Asrg] 5.b. opt-out, opt-in, and explicit consent
,
Liudvikas Bukys
,
08:40
[Asrg] my idea
,
David Grier
,
07:43
[Asrg] ASRG work items - IP
,
Brian Witwicki
,
07:00
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
06:40
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
06:39
Re: [Asrg] ASRG work items
,
Jon Kyme
,
06:05
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Claus Färber
,
05:04
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Claus Färber
,
05:04
[Asrg] 2.c.1 and 6 - The importance of being Earnest
,
Kurt Magnusson
,
03:24
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (Query/C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
02:27
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Brad Templeton
,
00:44
April 09, 2003
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
23:50
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Brad Templeton
,
23:27
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
23:06
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Brad Templeton
,
22:42
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
21:47
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
21:41
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
wayne
,
21:31
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
20:50
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
20:46
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Steven G. Willis
,
20:16
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Brad Spencer
,
18:43
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
wayne
,
18:40
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Brad Templeton
,
18:03
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
wayne
,
17:52
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
17:02
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Brad Templeton
,
16:21
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:58
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:55
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Craig Hughes
,
15:41
Re: [Asrg] honey pot plugged
,
Justin Mason
,
15:34
[Asrg] in essence (continued)
,
matthew richards
,
15:12
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
waltdnes
,
15:11
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Fenley
,
15:05
Re: [Asrg] honey pot plugged
,
Brad Spencer
,
15:05
Re: [Asrg] honey pot plugged
,
Justin Mason
,
14:49
Re: in essence [Asrg] rules!
,
John Fenley
,
14:09
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:07
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:04
Re: [Asrg] honey pot plugged
,
Brad Spencer
,
13:59
Re: [Asrg] honey pot plugged
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
13:49
Re: [Asrg] honey pot plugged
,
Brad Spencer
,
13:24
in essence (Re: [Asrg] honey pot plugged)
,
matthew richards
,
13:19
Re: [Asrg] honey pot plugged
,
John Fenley
,
12:51
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
11:34
RE: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Paul Judge
,
11:15
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
11:05
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
11:03
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
11:00
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
10:34
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
10:03
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Kee Hinckley
,
10:03
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Kee Hinckley
,
10:00
RE: [Asrg] Automated responses strike again
,
Tom Thomson
,
09:40
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
06:53
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Matt Sergeant
,
06:16
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce
,
Jim Youll
,
05:50
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
05:45
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
05:42
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
05:10
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Matt Sergeant
,
05:05
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
04:32
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Matt Sergeant
,
04:20
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
03:50
RE: [Asrg] Ban the honeypots?
,
Brad Spencer
,
03:19
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
03:02
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Matt Sergeant
,
02:09
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Matt Sergeant
,
01:59
RE: [Asrg] Ban the honeypots?
,
John Fenley
,
00:21
April 08, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce
,
John Fenley
,
23:04
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
23:03
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
23:02
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
22:36
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
22:27
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
20:00
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:47
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Constantinescu
,
19:47
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:26
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
19:19
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
19:16
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
19:14
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:54
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:50
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
18:33
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
waltdnes
,
18:32
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
18:32
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
18:08
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:03
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:03
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
18:01
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
waltdnes
,
17:38
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
J C Lawrence
,
16:30
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
16:12
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
15:59
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Bob Atkinson
,
15:48
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
15:45
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:24
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
15:05
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Brad Templeton
,
15:01
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:44
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:06
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:04
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:04
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:03
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
13:36
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Brad Templeton
,
12:44
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:00
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:55
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Michael Marking
,
11:39
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Kee Hinckley
,
11:20
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
10:46
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:35
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
10:30
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:24
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:12
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:02
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
09:53
RE: [Asrg] ASRG meeting minutes
,
william
,
09:18
Re: [Asrg] ASRG meeting minutes
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:08
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
08:53
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
08:46
RE: [Asrg] ASRG meeting minutes
,
Paul Judge
,
08:45
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Kee Hinckley
,
08:38
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:33
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
08:06
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:04
RE: [Asrg] 4.a Taxonomy -- Where would CHANNELS fit into the Taxonomy ?
,
Eric D. Williams
,
08:02
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
07:47
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
07:37
Re: [Asrg] ASRG meeting minutes
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:33
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:28
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jon Kyme
,
06:31
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
06:15
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
05:46
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
04:45
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Claus Färber
,
03:25
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Claus Färber
,
03:23
April 07, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
22:38
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Brad Templeton
,
20:53
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Vernon Schryver
,
20:34
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Constantinescu
,
20:01
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:58
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:47
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Constantinescu
,
18:02
Re: [Asrg] Re: delaying response to final dot
,
Dave Crocker
,
17:57
RE: [Asrg] MAC Constructed Message Ids.
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
16:57
Re: [Asrg] Re: delaying response to final dot
,
Claus Färber
,
16:57
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Claus Färber
,
16:57
RE: [Asrg] 4.a Taxonomy -- Where would CHANNELS fit into the Tax onomy ?
,
Paul Judge
,
16:09
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:50
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:43
Re: [Asrg] ASRG meeting minutes
,
Russell-2asrg44all-
,
15:35
RE: [Asrg] emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?) - products
,
asrg
,
15:34
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
John Constantinescu
,
15:23
Re: [Asrg] Automated responses strike again
,
waltdnes
,
15:05
Re: [Asrg] 4.a Taxonomy -- Where would CHANNELS fit into the Taxonomy ?
,
Russell-2asrg44all-
,
15:01
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:00
Re: [Asrg] 4.a Taxonomy -- Where would CHANNELS fit into the Tax onomy ?
,
Russell-2asrg44all-
,
15:00
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:23
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
wayne
,
14:22
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
13:12
Re: [Asrg] Re: delaying response to final dot (was: Ban the bounce)
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:12
Re: [Asrg] MAC Constructed Message Ids.
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:02
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea.
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
12:40
RE: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea.
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
12:37
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:37
Re: [Asrg] MAC Constructed Message Ids.
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:36
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea.
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
12:32
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:32
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:30
RE: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea.
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
12:11
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honeypot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
11:44
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea.
,
Kee Hinckley
,
11:28
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Art Pollard
,
11:05
Re: [Asrg] New take on emerging idea. (yet another C-R system?)
,
wayne
,
11:01
Re: [Asrg] Re: delaying response to final dot (was: Ban the bounce)
,
Claus Assmann
,
10:21
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honeypot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
10:17
Re: [Asrg] Re: delaying response to final dot (was: Ban the bounce)
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
10:11
RE: [Asrg] MAC Constructed Message Ids.
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:59
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Kee Hinckley
,
09:34
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honeypot plug
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
09:33
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Vernon Schryver
,
09:31
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
09:27
Re: [Asrg] MAC Constructed Message Ids.
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:26
[Asrg] Re: delaying response to final dot (was: Ban the bounce)
,
Claus Assmann
,
09:25
RE: [Asrg] 4.a Taxonomy -- Where would CHANNELS fit into the Tax onomy ?
,
Paul Judge
,
09:25
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honeypot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
09:24
[Asrg] New take on emerging idea.
,
John Constantinescu
,
09:07
RE: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
08:55
RE: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honey pot plug
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
08:38
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honyp ot plug
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
08:38
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
08:30
RE: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honeypot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
08:30
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Tom Thomson
,
08:15
RE: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honyp ot plug
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
08:13
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honypot plug
,
Kee Hinckley
,
08:04
RE: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honyp ot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
07:45
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honyp ot plug
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
07:31
RE: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honyp ot plug
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:31
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Sauer, Damon
,
07:06
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
06:49
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honeypot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
06:01
RE: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honyp ot plug
,
Sauer, Damon
,
05:50
RE: [Asrg] MAC Constructed Message Ids.
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
05:49
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Sauer, Damon
,
05:43
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
04:20
RE: [Asrg] MAC Constructed Message Ids.
,
Bruce Brown
,
02:41
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Claus Färber
,
02:02
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Claus Färber
,
02:02
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:18
April 06, 2003
[Asrg] Why Am I Getting All This Spam? -- Unsolicited Commercial E-mail Research Six Month Report
,
J C Lawrence
,
23:29
RE: [Asrg] MAC Constructed Message Ids.
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
21:04
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
20:53
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honypot plug
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
20:42
Re: [Asrg] MAC Constructed Message Ids.
,
J C Lawrence
,
19:56
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) honypot plug
,
Brad Spencer
,
19:36
[Asrg] MAC Constructed Message Ids.
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
19:36
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam)
,
Brad Spencer
,
19:20
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:15
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:15
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...)
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
19:10
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:59
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:59
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:59
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:38
RE: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...)
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
18:31
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:30
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...)
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:24
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:20
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:15
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:10
[Asrg] Automated responses strike again
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:04
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
17:56
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
17:40
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam)
,
Brad Spencer
,
17:36
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
wayne
,
17:33
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
wayne
,
17:12
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...)
,
wayne
,
17:07
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
17:03
Re: [Asrg] ASRG meeting minutes
,
Dave Crocker
,
16:34
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
15:34
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
waltdnes
,
15:18
[Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
15:13
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
waltdnes
,
14:59
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Art Pollard
,
14:43
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:25
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:19
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:08
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
J C Lawrence
,
14:00
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:57
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:51
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
wayne
,
13:31
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:24
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
13:22
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:20
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:11
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
13:09
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
12:59
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:54
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
James Wilde
,
12:25
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:24
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
11:54
Re: [Asrg] 4.a Taxonomy -- Where would CHANNELS fit into the Taxonomy ?
,
Vernon Schryver
,
11:47
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
11:38
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
11:08
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
11:06
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
11:06
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
11:04
[Asrg] 4.a Taxonomy -- Where would CHANNELS fit into the Taxonomy ?
,
Russell-2asrg44all-
,
10:55
[Asrg] two notes that went "down the wrong pipe"
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
09:01
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:55
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
08:44
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
wayne
,
08:39
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:35
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:16
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Jim Youll
,
08:04
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
07:34
Re: [Asrg] 4.a. Taxonomy changes (was: Taxonomy and List of Requireme nts)
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
07:24
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam)
,
Brad Spencer
,
05:43
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
05:42
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
05:34
Re: Opt-In (Was Re: [Asrg] Proposal for Opt-Out)
,
Richard Johnson
,
03:27
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
03:04
April 05, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
J C Lawrence
,
23:53
Re: [Asrg] 4.a. Taxonomy changes (was: Taxonomy and List of Requireme nts)
,
Alan DeKok
,
22:10
[Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems
,
waltdnes
,
21:24
[Asrg] 4.a. Taxonomy changes (was: Taxonomy and List of Requireme nts)
,
Paul Judge
,
16:28
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:49
Re: RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
02:05
April 04, 2003
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
23:21
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Kee Hinckley
,
20:13
Re: Opt-In (Was Re: [Asrg] Proposal for Opt-Out)
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:25
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
mathew
,
16:46
Re: Opt-In (Was Re: [Asrg] Proposal for Opt-Out)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:43
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:41
[Asrg] Dream system- Nirvana or Nightmare?
,
Sauer, Damon
,
14:18
Re: RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
14:16
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam)
,
Brad Spencer
,
14:15
Re: [Asrg] Consent
,
Brad Spencer
,
12:59
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:58
Re: [Asrg] Consent
,
Kee Hinckley
,
12:35
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
12:33
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:29
Re: Opt-In (Was Re: [Asrg] Proposal for Opt-Out)
,
Jeff Macdonald
,
12:10
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Nickle, Michael
,
12:09
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
11:22
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
matthew richards
,
11:05
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Eric D. Williams
,
11:02
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Eric D. Williams
,
11:02
RE: [Asrg] Consent
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
10:42
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:30
Re: [Asrg] Consent
,
matthew richards
,
10:29
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
10:29
[Asrg] honey smoked "ham" <i>is</i> ridiculous
,
matthew richards
,
10:26
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Alan DeKok
,
10:14
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
10:12
Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam)
,
Paul Judge
,
09:58
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
09:48
RE: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics
,
Tom Thomson
,
09:38
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
09:33
RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy and List of Requirements
,
Brad Spencer
,
09:23
RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy and List of Requirements
,
Paul Judge
,
08:56
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
08:06
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Jim Youll
,
07:03
Re: [Asrg] Consent
,
Troy Rollo
,
06:41
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
05:16
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
william
,
05:07
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
04:21
Re: RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
03:55
Classification of solutions and which ones do real-time check (was Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures)
,
william
,
02:13
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Matt Sergeant
,
02:11
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
william
,
01:58
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:42
Re: RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:41
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
william
,
01:22
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
00:50
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Kee Hinckley
,
00:35
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
00:35
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
00:35
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
waltdnes
,
00:08
April 03, 2003
Re: [Asrg] It's not spam, it's ooga-booga... Was: 5c. Message Status
,
waltdnes
,
23:35
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
J C Lawrence
,
23:30
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
J C Lawrence
,
23:02
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
21:23
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
21:13
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
20:56
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
J C Lawrence
,
20:09
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
mathew
,
20:06
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
20:06
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:49
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
18:52
Re: [Asrg] Consent
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:40
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:21
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:21
Re: [Asrg] Consent
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
17:46
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
16:50
Re: [Asrg] Consent
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:47
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
16:42
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
16:35
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Eric D. Williams
,
16:33
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Eric D. Williams
,
16:27
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Eric D. Williams
,
16:20
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
16:08
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Eric D. Williams
,
16:07
Re: [Asrg] "ham" <i>is</i> ridiculous
,
Kee Hinckley
,
15:47
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
15:40
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Markus Stumpf
,
15:36
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
15:27
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Kee Hinckley
,
15:15
Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics
,
Kee Hinckley
,
15:15
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Kee Hinckley
,
15:15
Re: [Asrg] spamstones
,
Kee Hinckley
,
15:14
Re: [Asrg] Consent
,
matthew richards
,
14:53
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Brad Spencer
,
14:49
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Justin Mason
,
14:43
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:41
Re: [Asrg] Consent
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:21
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:18
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:17
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:17
Re: [Asrg] It's not spam, it's ooga-booga... Was: 5c. Message Status
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:16
Re: [Asrg] define spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:16
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:16
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:42
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
william
,
13:29
Re: [Asrg] where is the current draft of the taxonomy
,
william
,
13:17
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:11
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:07
[Asrg] where is the current draft of the taxonomy
,
Russell-2asrg44all-
,
13:06
[Asrg] Taxoonomy and List of Requirements
,
Brad Spencer
,
13:06
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:01
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:00
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Justin Mason
,
12:54
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Justin Mason
,
12:50
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
william
,
11:50
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:38
[Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
matthew richards
,
11:36
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:36
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Matt Sergeant
,
11:25
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
11:22
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:16
[Asrg] "ham" <i>is</i> ridiculous
,
matthew richards
,
11:16
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Bob Atkinson
,
10:58
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
matthew richards
,
10:57
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
10:55
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
10:46
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:45
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
10:36
Re: [Asrg] Indescriminate WANTED spam
,
Markus Stumpf
,
10:36
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
10:35
Re: [Asrg] Indescriminate WANTED spam
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
10:30
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
10:30
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
10:17
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Matt Sergeant
,
10:10
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
william
,
09:44
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:32
RE: [Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:31
[Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive
,
Matt Sergeant
,
09:14
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:11
Re: [Asrg] Indescriminate WANTED spam
,
Markus Stumpf
,
09:10
RE: [Asrg] Email Address Verification Notes (fwd)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:07
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:06
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:05
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
william
,
09:02
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Matt Sergeant
,
08:54
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Markus Stumpf
,
08:48
Re: [Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive
,
Brad Spencer
,
08:43
[Asrg] Indescriminate WANTED spam
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
08:38
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
08:37
[Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive
,
Jim Youll
,
08:26
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:26
[Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive
,
Matt Sergeant
,
08:20
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:00
[Asrg] "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive
,
Jim Youll
,
07:43
Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Matt Sergeant
,
06:46
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Kee Hinckley
,
06:45
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Markus Stumpf
,
05:49
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Markus Stumpf
,
05:35
RE: [Asrg] Email Address Verification Notes (fwd)
,
william
,
03:49
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
william
,
01:49
Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:43
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
00:43
April 02, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
J C Lawrence
,
23:19
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
J C Lawrence
,
23:14
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Art Pollard
,
22:43
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Art Pollard
,
22:36
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Claus Assmann
,
21:03
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
20:55
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Art Pollard
,
20:46
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Justin Mason
,
19:50
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Claus Assmann
,
19:48
Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:13
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:53
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:32
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:16
RE: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
18:15
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
18:12
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Bob Atkinson
,
18:11
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:02
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Bob Atkinson
,
18:00
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Justin Mason
,
17:53
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Eric D. Williams
,
17:37
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Eric D. Williams
,
17:15
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Eric D. Williams
,
17:15
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Eric D. Williams
,
17:15
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Eric D. Williams
,
17:15
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
william
,
17:11
Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics
,
Clifton Royston
,
17:07
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
waltdnes
,
17:02
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
16:38
RE: [Asrg] Email Address Verification Notes (fwd)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
16:34
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Bob Atkinson
,
16:32
Spam costs. RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
16:24
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
mathew
,
16:22
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
william
,
16:15
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Eric Imsand
,
16:15
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
16:12
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Mark Delany
,
15:58
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
william
,
15:55
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:53
[Asrg] Turing Test ...
,
Art Pollard
,
15:50
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Eric S. Imsand
,
15:50
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:36
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Eric S. Imsand
,
15:28
Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:22
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:11
[Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures
,
Justin Mason
,
15:10
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Markus Stumpf
,
15:06
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:03
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:55
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Eric S. Imsand
,
14:48
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:48
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:39
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Eric S. Imsand
,
14:38
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:38
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:34
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Steven F Siirila
,
14:29
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:28
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Markus Stumpf
,
14:28
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:27
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
william
,
14:27
RE: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
14:27
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
14:24
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:24
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
14:21
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:13
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Steven F Siirila
,
14:10
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:07
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Steven F Siirila
,
14:05
RE: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:03
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:02
Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Jim Youll
,
14:02
Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics (Was Re: [Asrg] spamstones)
,
Clifton Royston
,
13:54
Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Clifton Royston
,
13:52
[Asrg] 2.0 Metrics (Was Re: [Asrg] spamstones)
,
Clifton Royston
,
13:38
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Kee Hinckley
,
13:33
[Asrg] ASRG meeting minutes
,
Paul Judge
,
13:27
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Markus Stumpf
,
12:56
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Steven F Siirila
,
12:25
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
12:24
RE: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
12:23
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Markus Stumpf
,
12:18
[Asrg] Honeypots
,
Brad Spencer
,
12:15
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Eric S. Imsand
,
12:14
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Markus Stumpf
,
12:09
[Asrg] Email Address Verification Notes (fwd)
,
william
,
11:55
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
11:45
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Bob Atkinson
,
11:35
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Kaitlin Duck Sherwood
,
11:21
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Bob Atkinson
,
11:03
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Eric D. Williams
,
11:02
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Eric D. Williams
,
11:02
RE: 3. Volunteers to work on Requirements (was RE: [Asrg] voting?)
,
william
,
10:26
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
william
,
10:24
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Eric D. Williams
,
10:12
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:46
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:46
[Asrg] 6. Proposal for new solutions: Next gen email system requests/id eas
,
Paul Judge
,
09:34
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:28
[Asrg] whitelisting server and not users
,
Markus Stumpf
,
09:27
RE: 3. Volunteers to work on Requirements (was RE: [Asrg] voting?)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:23
RE: 3. Volunteers to work on Requirements (was RE: [Asrg] voting?)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:22
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
william
,
09:08
Re: [Asrg] FW: Next gen email system requests/ideas
,
Dave Crocker
,
08:54
[Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates
,
Tom Thomson
,
08:48
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Kee Hinckley
,
08:47
[Asrg] FW: Next gen email system requests/ideas
,
Jason Hihn
,
08:34
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Markus Stumpf
,
08:09
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:05
3. Volunteers to work on Requirements (was RE: [Asrg] voting?)
,
Paul Judge
,
07:52
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Jason Hihn
,
07:05
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?
,
Chris Lewis
,
06:43
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Chris Lewis
,
06:42
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Eric S. Imsand
,
02:14
April 01, 2003
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Vernon Schryver
,
21:48
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Vernon Schryver
,
21:37
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
20:46
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
20:41
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Eric S. Imsand
,
19:55
RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:45
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:38
[Asrg] SMTP over SSL
,
Bob Atkinson
,
18:22
RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email
,
Bob Atkinson
,
17:51
RE: [Asrg] voting?
,
Eric D. Williams
,
17:00
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
16:53
Re: [Asrg] spamstones
,
Justin Mason
,
16:21
RE: [Asrg] voting?
,
Paul Judge
,
16:21
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
mathew
,
16:01
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
mathew
,
15:58
Re: [Asrg] spamstones
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:34
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:23
Re: [Asrg] spamstones
,
Liudvikas Bukys
,
15:09
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Jason Hihn
,
14:47
Re: [Asrg] spamstones
,
Justin Mason
,
14:39
[Asrg] voting?
,
matthew richards
,
14:21
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
J C Lawrence
,
13:43
Re: [Asrg] spamstones
,
bukys
,
12:36
Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Liudvikas Bukys
,
12:22
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
william
,
12:04
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?
,
Justin Mason
,
11:53
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:50
Re: [Asrg] spamstones
,
Justin Mason
,
11:49
RE: [Asrg] spamstones
,
Eric D. Williams
,
11:21
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
11:17
[Asrg] off topic, but hauntingly relevant...
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
11:10
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Eric D. Williams
,
11:08
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Jason Hihn
,
11:06
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?
,
wayne
,
10:18
[Asrg] spamstones
,
Dave Crocker
,
10:11
RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email
,
Eric D. Williams
,
10:04
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Kee Hinckley
,
10:01
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Chuq Von Rospach
,
09:57
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Kee Hinckley
,
09:57
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Kee Hinckley
,
09:57
RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email
,
Vernon Schryver
,
09:46
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:43
RE: [Asrg] define spam
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:24
RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:23
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:11
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:07
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:38
RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Eric D. Williams
,
08:34
RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Eric D. Williams
,
08:34
RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email
,
Eric D. Williams
,
08:33
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
william
,
08:29
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
08:29
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
Jason Hihn
,
08:06
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
wayne
,
07:47
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Jon Kyme
,
07:22
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?
,
mathew
,
07:16
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
mathew
,
07:07
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?
,
Matt Sergeant
,
06:57
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?
,
Markus Stumpf
,
06:06
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?
,
Matt Sergeant
,
03:53
Re: [Asrg] March spam ratio
,
Matt Sergeant
,
03:28
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:34
Re: [Asrg] RFC3514 -> Evil Header (note: consider this first email for april)
,
Matthew Goddard
,
01:29
[Asrg] RFC3514 -> Evil Header (note: consider this first email for april)
,
william
,
00:30
<
Prev Period
]
[
Next Period
>