ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios

2003-04-20 10:23:42
From: "Alan DeKok" <aland(_at_)freeradius(_dot_)org>
To: asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 09:32:09 -0400

"John Fenley" <pontifier(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
> C/R can mess with mailing lists.
> I proposed a system to fix that problem. I recieved no constructive > criticism, and when I proposed government funding that became the issue not
> wether or not it could work.

  Uh, no.  You proposed government *control*.  "Government funding"
means you get a research grant to implement a system that everyone can
use.

I kindly point you to my mention of government involvement which sparked the whole afair. There is no mention of control, just funding.

https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/current/msg03371.html

> The main advantage I see to C/R is that it does not require any technical > knowlege, and it can prevent a new user from ever seing a single spam thus
> disrupting its propegation.

  The main disadvantage is that I'm not going to talk to someone using
a C/R system, because it means increasing *my* workload, to lower
*their* spam problem.  This is fundamentally evil, in my opinion.

So don't talk to them. The point is that C/R stops people who dont want to talk to the reciever. You don't care, therfore C/R works. If you had any sort of desire to speak to the person, you would answer the challenge and be done with it.

> Filters of any sort, on the other hand, require user input and must be
> constantly trained as spammers evolve. Users will only do this after they > see spam as a problem, this is probly after they bought their *free* viagra.

  There are spamtraps, which receive *nothing* but spam.  Many filter
systems use spamtraps as an automated source of spam.

I am trying to keep this out of the "expert user" realm.
I am trying to propose a system that a novice user can step into, and not get spam.

> A 1% increase in overall productivity could mean the difference
> between a good economy, and a bad one.

  That's nice.

Mock me if you must, but a small increase can have a huge effect when that small increase is widely distributed.

John Fenley

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg