Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios
2003-04-19 18:55:17
From: "Alan DeKok" <aland(_at_)freeradius(_dot_)org>
Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:
> Instead of thinking about a disease that has been eliminated, think
> about crime, war and cockroaches. It is not realistic to expect to
> eliminate any of these, no matter how much any of us might wish
> otherwise.
From a biological view, smallpox was eradicated only because there
were no non-human vectors distributing it. I'm not sure the same is
true for spam.
To continue the disease analogy, the common cold is difficult to
eradicate because it's ubiquitous, easy to transfer, and has few
lethal side effects. AIDS is difficult to eradicate because it's
no common, difficult to transfer, and has a long gestation people
before carriers realize they're sick.
Most diseases fall somewhere in between. Spam looks more like the
common cold than any other analagous disease, so it's probably going
to be impossible to get rid of entirely.
I dissagree. It may have been that in the past spam didn't cause "lethal"
side effects, but the recent rise in spam is literaly costing hundreds of
lives per year (in lost productivity).
Spam uses human vectors to propegate just as smallpox did. The type of
internet user who actually buys products from spam is the human vector that
allows spam to complete it's "life cycle".
A system that makes it impossible for those people to recieve spam is
nessisary if we are to eradicate this "plague".
I have heard many arguments against Challenge/Response systems, but many of
those complaints have been about issues experienced internet users would
face. I agree for the most part, but a lot of those reasons are not valid
for "newbies".
C/R would not be good for a buissiness address.
A buissiness is not going to buy from spam, thus they are not a vector
for it's propegation.
C/R is annoying to people.
C/R isn't going to stop a friend from emailing you. I'm guessing the
majority of email a new internet user recieves is from personal friends.
Also my twist on the turing test *could* be fun for a new user, and whomever
decides to mail them.
C/R can mess with mailing lists.
I proposed a system to fix that problem. I recieved no constructive
criticism, and when I proposed government funding that became the issue not
wether or not it could work.
The main advantage I see to C/R is that it does not require any technical
knowlege, and it can prevent a new user from ever seing a single spam thus
disrupting its propegation.
Filters of any sort, on the other hand, require user input and must be
constantly trained as spammers evolve. Users will only do this after they
see spam as a problem, this is probly after they bought their *free* viagra.
I see spam as a major problem. A 1% increase in overall productivity could
mean the difference between a good economy, and a bad one. Spam decreases
productivity. Immediate action is nessisary. I feel a disease eradication
aproach is the correct one.
John Fenley
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
Previous by Date: |
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios, Dave Crocker |
Next by Date: |
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios, Alan DeKok |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios, Carl Ford |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversity and scenarios, Alan DeKok |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|