At 3:09 PM -0700 4/29/03, J C Lawrence wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:49:09 -0400
Kee Hinckley <nazgul(_at_)somewhere(_dot_)com> wrote:
So would a marker that stated the type of mail (e.g. transactional
vs. informational) be valuable?
If it were sufficiently resistant to forgery and abuse.
So it would need to be cryptographically signed, and you'd need to be
able to map the message to an accountable sender. Where by
"accountable" I mean that there is a third party to handle complaints
and somehow terminate the signature.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Junk-Free Email Filtering
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg