[ May be there is a time to create new category on
www.rfc-ignorant.org
]
>>
>
>And I'd like a good explanation of how you'd detect that behavior.
>
>
* In one case I detected it by non email communication (phone: Why
But what if the "recipient" was (gasp) lying?
Oh come on.
Are you really just trying to pester this guy?
Apologies to Andrzej, I should have said:
"And I'd like a good explanation of how ONE would detect that behavior"
But would you be happy if a sender/receiver collusion could get you
blacklisted (rfc-ignorant-like)? Or would the presentation of relevant logs
be a sufficient defence?
Bottom line. I'm agreeing with him.
If the sender doesn't have a reliable means for distinguishing between
non-deliveries with and without user control... well, it gives scope for
misunderstanding. And it's not feasible to ring up everybody I send mail to
so I can close the loop.
AF said:
Whenever you send a email message you should always get message
delivered or info why it can not be delivered or info why some server
refused to deliver your message.
I agree, pretty much. That would be the ideal state of affairs.
Apologies for causing offence / confusion.
--
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg