On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:07:32 -0400
Barry Shein <bzs(_at_)world(_dot_)std(_dot_)com> wrote:
On April 30, 2003 at 13:43 claw(_at_)kanga(_dot_)nu (J C Lawrence) wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:16:47 -0400 Barry Shein
<bzs(_at_)world(_dot_)std(_dot_)com>
wrote:
(large) Mailing lists will have to change, probably become some sort
of pull technology unless the sender is willing to pay per piece.
What distinguishes between a large and small list and how can you
tell?
ISPs and others start refusing to deliver their traffic.
Not my question. How does a third party determine that a list is "too
large" (or not)? Given such a check, how is that check not subject to
very trivial gaming in attempt to push, if break, the limits?
Anyhow, you seem to believe you're talking to the Wage and Price
Control Board, to use a venerable early 1970's analogy.
Not a reference I'm familiar with I'm afraid. I've spent most of the
last years outside the US.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw(_at_)kanga(_dot_)nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg