ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems

2003-04-08 07:47:41
No, but I think it's important to return a full header at the minimum. It depends on who you think your audience for the bounce is. end users tend to want the whole thing so in case of a typo on sending they can get the message back adn send it again. programs that process bounces need enough info to process them properly.

Some folks return messages chopped off at some size, a useful compromise except it truncates MIME messages, which sometimes makes life interesting.

If I have a DSN that tells me what address it was originally sent to, I'm happy. If the DSN went through two sites that rewrote the addresses and now has no relevance to what it started out as, I need the full header to try to reconstruct what was broken along the way. If the header gets partially stripped (only minimal headers) I need the body to try to get around that. The more you muck with the message, the more message I need to avoid your mucking... (grin)


On Tuesday, April 8, 2003, at 06:15  AM, Jim Youll wrote:

Is it _absolutely_ necessary to bounce back the entire message body, rather than just status and delivery data?

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>