On Sun, 06 Apr 2003 15:44:11 -0600
Art Pollard <pollarda(_at_)lextek(_dot_)com> wrote:
At 08:42 AM 4/6/2003 -0700, you wrote:
<mutters things to self about the utterly broken aspect of Eudora and
its handling of message attributions. Just who the heck is "you"
supposed to be in a group discussion?>
Instead, I would like to see a new and better protocol. The new mail
programs could take advantage of it and its new capabilities. (I for
one would like to see a References: header just like in NNTP for
article threading though that has nothing to do with spam in itself.)
References: is a currently supported header, listed as a "should occur
in replies.". See RFC 2822
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw(_at_)kanga(_dot_)nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg