On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 08:39:50PM -0400, Kee Hinckley wrote
This is just too funny. When will people get a clue? Here we are in
the middle of discussing banning bounced messages, fixing challenge
responses, and of course, Turing Tests.
Apparently they've never heard of Turing in Toronto.
At 6:12 PM -0400 4/6/03, Bob Jonkman wrote:
X-Msgfire: MAIL https://www.messagefire.com/member/report.html?id=368124
X-PM-Status: PURE https://www.messagefire.com/member/report.html?id=368124
Return-Path: <Postmaster(_at_)city(_dot_)toronto(_dot_)on(_dot_)ca>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.7.1
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 18:12:53 -0400
From: "Bob Jonkman" <bjonkman(_at_)city(_dot_)toronto(_dot_)on(_dot_)ca>
Sender: Postmaster(_at_)city(_dot_)toronto(_dot_)on(_dot_)ca
Reply-To: bjonkman(_at_)city(_dot_)toronto(_dot_)on(_dot_)ca
To: <nazgul(_at_)somewhere(_dot_)com>
Subject: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...) (Reply
to Test Message: )
Your test message has been successfully received!
This is an automated reply to a message sent with with the subject
line containing "test message". Your message has been deleted. If
you did not intend this, please resend your message, but make sure
it does not have a subject line containing "test message"!
And my city taxes go for that ?!?! Another example of why content-
based filtering isn't to be trusted.
--
Walter Dnes <waltdnes(_at_)waltdnes(_dot_)org>
An infinite number of monkeys pounding away on keyboards will
eventually produce a report showing that Windows is more secure,
and has a lower TCO, than linux.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg