ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems

2003-04-09 17:52:47
In <8844(_dot_)1049929064(_at_)kanga(_dot_)nu> J C Lawrence 
<claw(_at_)kanga(_dot_)nu> writes:

On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:11:29 -0400 waltdnes  
<waltdnes(_at_)waltdnes(_dot_)org> wrote:

Practical question... (Theoretical types can stick their fingers in
their ears while I ask) how many MTAs (besides Qmail with
"Return-Path" headers) make this info available to the MUA ?  

Exim can, but requires a non-default (at least under Debian/Linux)
configfile option.

Are you sure that this is not the default behavior under Debian/Linux?
The copy of eximconfig on my "sid" version shows return_path_add
options on the appropriate transports.


And in those cases, how many MUAs would know about it ?  

Proximal to zero.

Even if Debian/Linux add return-path headers by default, it wouldn't
change the answer.  However, I don't know enough about other mailers
to know if "proximal to zero" is right or not.


-wayne

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>