On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:19:47 -0700
Brad Templeton <brad(_at_)templetons(_dot_)com> wrote:
Challenge/response is like this. In fact, today, C/R works by simply
asking for any reply at all.
Then we should head forward. Taking challenge/response first:
1) Are we sufficiently agreed that challenge/response will be a part
of the solution that we can move ahead on its design?
2) Do we need to define a taxonomy of the rights and forms of consent
being acquired, or are we content with a simple, "I can send you
mail?"
3) Is there more needed within the challenge/response system for spam
prevention other than/outside of the simple challenge response (eg
some sort of testimonial or contract on the basis of the responder)?
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw(_at_)kanga(_dot_)nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg