ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details

2003-04-01 08:34:02
On Monday, March 31, 2003 11:12 PM, Vernon Schryver 
[SMTP:vjs(_at_)calcite(_dot_)rhyolite(_dot_)com] wrote:
8<...>8
So say you and I, but not everyone else.  There is no canon that
sanctifies any particular definition of a "spam ratio," at least
not yet.

I think (and maybe you are inferring this here) we must develop an acceptable 
definition for our work, with out one how will the effectiveness of a solution 
be evaluated?
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg