On Monday, March 31, 2003 11:50 PM, Steven F Siirila
[SMTP:sfs(_at_)tc(_dot_)umn(_dot_)edu]
wrote:
8<...>8
I was just pointing out that we don't "refuse to listen to them".
In fact, we occasionally get questions posed to our mail administration
address (apparently from those that don't go past the first URL) asking
why we are blocking them. That address never blocks mail, of course.
However, I do understand your point. Every site will have differing
requirements when it comes to blocking/filtering mail. It is precisely
this reason that sites should have available one or more configurable
solutions at their disposal. There is no one-size-fits-all that I can see
at this time.
Should sites that block/filter, etc. include a 'standardized' link to a
statement of policy or 'reason' description for blocking the message? Of
course we do have the abuse@ address [RFC2142] that is defined for CRM but what
if there were also a standard address or 'link' to policy descriptions for
blocking/filtering behavior? This is not an proposal for a standard message
but a standard Location: for such a message.
-e
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg