At 9:57 PM +0200 4/22/03, Andrzej Filip wrote:
e.g. making MTAs record bounces to non existing local addresses may
help in legal actions against "sender faking" spammers.
It woul require MTA to reject messages from <> to non existing local
recipient in reply to "final dot" insted of reply to RCPT TO: =>
bounce but keep for possible legal action
Legally require people to keep a copy of bounces to non-existent addresses?
Sigh. Time to buy another disk I guess.
Of course there's the minor problem that that means I have to collect
the message instead of bounce it at RCPT time. Who's going to pay
for the upgrade to my bandwidth?
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Junk-Free Email Filtering
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg