At 9:36 AM -0500 4/8/03, Brad Spencer wrote:
I've got an anti-spam method that works without needing any change
to existing protocols, is 100% efficient - no false positives, no
false negatives, is
You have an idea. When asked to document it, provide the numbers,
and indicate how it would be deployed, you never answered. There's
some software here, there's another example there. It's still
manual. But anyone can run it if they have spare time and a spare
machine and some spare IP addresses. That's not a proposal. Until
there's a concrete proposal you aren't going to get any support.
I'll say again what I said before. If the system is safely
deployable and automatic, then I'd very much like to try running it
(if only as a way of sampling spam). That's more support than you've
gotten from anyone else on this list. But to date you haven't
provided a convincing argument that such a goal is feasible (or that
you consider such a goal desirable). I'm not asking for
software--but respond to some of the issues with an organized plan
for how it would work.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Junk-Free Email Filtering
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg