On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Claus Assmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2003, Claus Färber wrote:
J C Lawrence <claw(_at_)kanga(_dot_)nu> schrieb/wrote:
On Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:19:26 -0400
Bad Idea.
RFC 2821 already requires a "fast" response to the final dot.
To avoid receiving duplicate messages as the result of timeouts, a
receiver-SMTP MUST seek to minimize the time required to respond to
the final <CRLF>.<CRLF> end of data indicator. See RFC 1047 [28] for
a discussion of this problem.
What if the mail is expanded via an alias to hundreds of recipients?
If the list is present, the message can be accepted. The various bounce
messages for the individual subscribers go to the list owner, not the
envelope from of someone posting to the list. The MTA can respond to the
list owner in any way mutually agreed upon. The idea is just not to
send DSNs to strangers.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg