On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:05:35PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote:
Using TXT records (e.g. MX will do also) has the big advantage that one
doesn't need another RFC to define a new type of record type or other
implementation work (add the new record type to DNS servers, to zone
management tools, ...). Deployment could be *very* fast at minimal cost.
Forgot about that:
existing DNSBL modules can be used. The BASE of the DNSBL would be
in-addr.arpa and the meaning of the existance of a TXT record would have
to be inverted.
This approach would also fix a lot of other DNS problems :-)) because
everyone would start to take a lot of care about their RR zones (which
they currently do not, as Bill Mannings statistics show very clearly).
\Maex
--
SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0
Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299
"The security, stability and reliability of a computer system is reciprocally
proportional to the amount of vacuity between the ears of the admin"
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg