In <E19AQvC-0007DS-00(_at_)argon(_dot_)connect(_dot_)org(_dot_)uk> "Jon Kyme"
<jrk(_at_)merseymail(_dot_)com> writes:
=>
BTW I would be thankful for good explanation which RFC recommendation
are broken by redirecting "suspected spam" to /dev/null for quoting in
messages to postmaster of such sites.
[ May be there is a time to create new category on www.rfc-ignorant.org ]
And I'd like a good explanation of how you'd detect that behavior.
Early on in the ASRG mailing list, I think it was Matt Sergent who
suggested that there should be a simple, standardized email that all
spam filters should agree to handle as spam. Apparently, the
anti-virus community as a test virus and this would be similar.
If such a test-spam was created and standardized by an RFC, you could
detect bogus behavior.
If the test-spam gets through to the recipient unflagged, then the
spam filter is broken.
If the test-spam gets bounced back or gets marked as spam, then the
spam filter is working (for at least this one thing).
If the test-spam just disappears, then the spam filter is broken.
-wayne
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg