Re: [Asrg] define spam


An irony is that most who believe in implicit consent do not believe
it applies to all mail.  They find various categories, such as child
pornography, impossible to consent to implicitly, and so for that
mail, they act as if they don't believe in implicit consent.


Why is this "an irony"? It seems me to be an eminently reasonable position.
Please explain.




--
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [Asrg] define spam, (continued) RE: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Spencer RE: [Asrg] define spam, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver RE: [Asrg] define spam, Kee Hinckley RE: [Asrg] define spam, matthew richards Re: RE: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme Re: RE: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Spencer Re: [Asrg] define spam, Alan DeKok Re: [Asrg] define spam, Chuq Von Rospach Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver Re: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme <= Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver Re: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver Re: [Asrg] define spam, J C Lawrence Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver Re: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme Re: [Asrg] define spam, J C Lawrence Re: [Asrg] define spam, Chuq Von Rospach Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver Re: [Asrg] define spam, J C Lawrence

Previous by Date:	Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Kee Hinckley
Next by Date:	Re: RE: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Next by Thread:	Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]