I also agree. Legal solutions are already being worked on, but are never
going to be sufficient to adequately solve the problem. The most that a
legal solution can do is bring some measure of uniformity to the law, making
spam easier to address. The only true, effective solution is going to be a
technical one, IMHO.
-Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric D. Williams [mailto:eric(_at_)infobro(_dot_)com]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 9:34 AM
To: 'Vernon Schryver'; asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [Asrg] Legal Suggestions ....
I agree,
IMHO, continued focus on 'lawyering' is not an appropriate pursuit. Indeed,
we
should consider the impact of developing a solution and how it may be used
to
leverage legal frameworks or enforcement but if we are attempting to define
a
legal solution, I think that is best left to 'legal' society. This is a
technical forum and (as I said, we should consider but...) we should be
focused on technical solutions/approaches.
-e
On Wednesday, April 16, 2003 10:30 PM, Vernon Schryver
[SMTP:vjs(_at_)calcite(_dot_)rhyolite(_dot_)com] wrote:
8<...>8
My suggestion is to leave the lawyering to the lawyers, including the
familiar controversy over whether DNS blacklists only recommend and
never block. Even if we get the lawyering right, the lawyers will
insist on re-doing it.
Vernon Schryver vjs(_at_)rhyolite(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg