In <aT5vaIe86J8qbrEwf02(_at_)x> Scott Nelson <scott(_at_)spamwolf(_dot_)com>
writes:
That would be an interesting idea, except that the address of that
sort that is most commonly forged in spam lacks a domain to check or
compare (as well as a user name). Remember that bounces are supposed
to come from "<>". See section 6.1 of RFC 2821.
Maybe we should change that.
That's one of the purposes of this group isn't? -
To suggest changes to SMTP that would make it more resistant to spam?
Go back and read the archives of the thread "ban the bounce" (or some
similiar title).
-wayne
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg