At 20:15 -0700 4/25/03, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Like 89 is not a big number, but it is a lot bigger than 0.
But it really depends on the quality of the sample... Intuitively it
"feels" like you'd need more than that to really represent the
situation, but looking at the sample by itself, there's no way to
know.
Perhaps this is one of those situations where it may be necessary to
take a very large sample that helps to determine how big a sample
size is really needed, and to judge the quality of those already
in-hand.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg