Not to be rude, but minutes are supposed to be rough
transcripts of what happened, not *filtered* transcripts.
It's bad procedure to intentionally leave items out of the
minutes, as it gives non-attendees a distorted view of what happened.
Russell volunteered to record minutes and provided a valid set of minutes.
He has already stated that he reviewed his notes and feels that he captured
"anything substantive". Therefore, your claim that anything was
intentionally left out is incorrect and inappropriate.
Your expectations of minutes are flawed. The minutes are not intended to be
transcripts, but rather a "thorough summary of the issues discussed during
the working group/BOF sessions".
http://www.ietf.org/instructions/minutes.html
I sent the minutes to the list for review about a week ago. If you have
anything that you feel is missing that would help to provide a thorough
summary to those not in attendance, then you can reply with that information
to the list. However, if you have any more accusations about the volunteers,
it would be appropriate to send those directly to me or the individual, not
to the list.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg