On Wednesday, May 14, 2003 10:24 PM, Eric Dean
[SMTP:eric(_at_)purespeed(_dot_)com] wrote:
8<...>8
<< File: CR_System.txt >>
Introduction
"Challenge Response systems intend to authenticate a sender's identity and
determine if a sender originated a message to a particular recipient."
Suggested change:
Challenge Response systems intend to validate message origination for a
designated recipient.
Rationale:
C/R systems may not be required to authenticate identity (perhaps they should
not, that does not matter) however the basis intent is to validate using some
mechanism (automated or manual) a messages originator, where origination may be
a human or machine actor. Additionally, the use of 'particular' connotes for
me that any 'addressed' recipient may be the subject of 'determination'. IMHO,
the more appropriate term would be designated recipient as that for me connotes
an association between the originator and the recipient.
On a slightly different point, in my terms a sender and originator are
functionally equivalent but since your paper also addresses possible machine
actors I use the term originator as a semantic abstraction.
<insert>
Message Originator
An actor, human or machine, that causes the insertion of an
original or revised message into the message transfer system.
Sender
The nomenclature used to designate a message originator or a
process acting as a origination point for a message in the MTS.
Sender is also a message header.
</insert>
-e
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg