IRTF Anti-spam Research Group (date)
[
Thread Index
]
[
Top
]
[
All Lists
]
<
Prev Period
]
[
Advanced
]
[
Next Period
>
May 31, 2003
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
20:27
Re: [Asrg] Challenge-response issues and solutions: see "Guarded Email" paper.
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
19:31
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
19:26
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
19:26
RE: [Asrg] The level of discourse has degenerated... It ain't use ful.
,
Paul Judge
,
14:19
Re: [Asrg] Need to know
,
Steven F Siirila
,
12:56
Re: [Asrg] Need to know
,
Scott Nelson
,
10:48
RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Scott Nelson
,
10:36
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Bob Wyman
,
10:24
Re: [Asrg] IP cross post (interesting RMX reception...)
,
Dave Crocker
,
09:14
May 30, 2003
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
waltdnes
,
22:19
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
22:07
[Asrg] IP cross post (interesting RMX reception...)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
21:52
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
kent
,
21:42
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
21:03
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
21:03
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Chris Lewis
,
20:58
RE: [Asrg] Re: Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines
,
Eric Dean
,
20:51
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
20:49
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Eric Dean
,
20:43
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Barry Shein
,
19:53
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Peter Kay
,
17:09
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:33
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Barry Shein
,
16:04
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Barry Shein
,
16:02
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Barry Shein
,
15:57
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Barry Shein
,
15:27
Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Barry Shein
,
15:14
RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Jon Kyme
,
14:22
RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
13:46
[Asrg] The level of discourse has degenerated... It ain't useful.
,
Bob Wyman
,
12:00
RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents
,
Peter Kay
,
11:49
Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents
,
Spencer Dawkins
,
05:03
May 29, 2003
Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents
,
Vern Paxson
,
23:51
Re: [Asrg] Choicelist
,
John Fenley
,
21:17
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Scott Nelson
,
21:17
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
21:05
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:31
[Asrg] 3. Volunteers to work on Requirements
,
Eric D. Williams
,
19:24
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
19:23
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
19:13
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
19:13
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:01
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
18:45
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
18:45
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
18:45
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:38
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:38
RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
17:35
RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
17:35
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
17:30
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Eric Dean
,
17:25
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
16:23
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
16:23
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Peter Kay
,
16:11
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Bob Wyman
,
15:56
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
15:48
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
15:43
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
15:43
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Peter Kay
,
15:37
[Asrg] Re: Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines
,
Jason R. Mastaler
,
15:37
[Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Jason R. Mastaler
,
15:33
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Barry Shein
,
15:13
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:12
RE: [Asrg] Re: Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines
,
Eric Dean
,
15:11
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Barry Shein
,
15:03
RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Peter Kay
,
14:59
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
waltdnes
,
14:56
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Bob Wyman
,
14:44
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Barry Shein
,
14:33
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
14:17
RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Peter Kay
,
14:14
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
14:06
RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Peter Kay
,
13:32
RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Bob Wyman
,
13:28
Re: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Richard Rognlie
,
12:56
[Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Peter Kay
,
12:45
[Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
,
Bob Wyman
,
12:20
RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
12:18
RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents
,
Bob Wyman
,
11:37
RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents
,
Peter Kay
,
10:47
RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents
,
Bob Wyman
,
10:05
Re: [Asrg] Choicelist
,
Jamie Lawrence
,
09:57
[Asrg] Re: Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines
,
Jason R. Mastaler
,
09:25
May 28, 2003
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
12:08
[Asrg] Choicelist
,
John Fenley
,
10:09
Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents
,
mathew
,
08:30
Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents
,
David Wheeler
,
07:16
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework
,
Eric Dean
,
06:53
May 27, 2003
Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked
,
Jed Margolin
,
22:57
[Asrg] Standard headers for anti-spam systems
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
19:40
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
19:29
[Asrg] News Article - ASRG Slashdotted
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
19:19
Re: [Asrg] Patents and ASRG (was (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
17:33
RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents
,
Paul Judge
,
17:10
[Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents
,
David Wheeler
,
15:15
[Asrg] Challenge-response issues and solutions: see "Guarded Email" paper.
,
David Wheeler
,
14:44
Re: [Asrg] Need to know
,
Markus Stumpf
,
13:31
[Asrg] News Article - C/R systems and mailing lists
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
09:55
[Asrg] Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
09:52
RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative
,
Tom Thomson
,
08:35
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework
,
Eric Dean
,
07:18
[Asrg] Re: What are your criteria for the end of spam?
,
Rodney Tillotson
,
03:51
Re: [Asrg] Need to know
,
Scott Nelson
,
00:54
May 26, 2003
Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
21:26
Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
21:00
Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:38
Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:12
Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked
,
Ken Hirsch
,
17:58
Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked
,
Kee Hinckley
,
17:50
Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
17:35
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Markus Stumpf
,
17:24
Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked
,
Vernon Schryver
,
17:15
Re: [Asrg] Need to know
,
Markus Stumpf
,
16:27
Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
15:27
Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked
,
Terri Oda
,
14:40
Re: [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on spam)
,
Mitch Wagner
,
12:29
Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:42
Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
06:39
[Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on spam)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
06:39
May 25, 2003
Re: [Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Articl e - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
mathew
,
21:03
Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
mathew
,
20:58
[Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on spam)
,
mathew
,
20:27
Re: [Asrg] What are your criteria for the end of spam?
,
David Cheatham
,
20:08
Re: [Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Articl e - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Troy Rollo
,
16:34
Re: [Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Articl e - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Dave Crocker
,
15:30
[Asrg] What are your criteria for the end of spam?
,
Shannon Jacobs
,
15:06
RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet another] article on spam)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:05
May 24, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Need to know
,
Scott Nelson
,
23:30
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
21:53
Re: [Asrg] Need to know
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
21:31
RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet another] article on spam)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
21:30
[Asrg] Need to know
,
Scott Nelson
,
13:02
RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet another] article on spam)
,
Howard Roth
,
11:01
Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:51
May 23, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:21
RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet anothe r] article on spam)
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:48
RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:48
RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:21
Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
16:18
RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative
,
Barry Shein
,
15:56
Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative
,
Barry Shein
,
15:46
RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative
,
Bob Wyman
,
15:03
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:49
Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:49
Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked
,
C. Wegrzyn
,
14:19
RE: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction
,
Barry Shein
,
14:14
Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:01
[Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Articl e - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
,
Paul Judge
,
14:01
RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet anothe r] article on spam)
,
Paul Judge
,
13:30
Re: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:10
Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative
,
Richard Rognlie
,
12:50
RE: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked
,
Paul Judge
,
12:47
Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked
,
Karl Kraft
,
12:36
[Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
12:35
[Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet another] article on spam)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
12:29
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
12:24
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
11:20
Re: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction (was RE: Som e data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses)
,
Jon Kyme
,
11:00
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
wayne
,
10:27
[Asrg] This mail list has been hacked
,
Jed Margolin
,
10:26
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
mathew
,
10:21
Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam
,
mathew
,
10:21
Re: [Asrg] [Yet another] article on spam
,
Shannon Jacobs
,
10:13
May 22, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
,
John Fenley
,
10:47
Re: [Asrg] ACK4
,
Jon Kyme
,
03:09
Re: [Asrg] ACK4
,
Scott Nelson
,
00:26
May 21, 2003
RE: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction
,
Jon Kyme
,
23:39
RE: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction
,
Jon Kyme
,
23:39
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Barry Shein
,
21:20
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Barry Shein
,
20:56
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric D. Williams
,
19:40
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric D. Williams
,
19:40
Re: [Asrg] ACK4
,
Jon Kyme
,
14:44
Re: [Asrg] ACK4
,
scott
,
14:07
Re: [Asrg] ACK4
,
Jon Kyme
,
12:52
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
12:41
Re: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction (was RE: Som e data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses)
,
Jon Kyme
,
12:36
Re: [Asrg] ACK4
,
Jon Kyme
,
12:33
Re: [Asrg] ACK4
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:29
Re: This is a research group not a standards group (was RE: [Asrg] Sh annon Jacob's article on spam)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
11:56
This is a research group not a standards group (was RE: [Asrg] Sh annon Jacob's article on spam)
,
Paul Judge
,
11:41
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Justin Mason
,
11:39
Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
11:29
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
11:12
Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
11:11
Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
11:09
[Asrg] ACK4
,
Scott Nelson
,
11:09
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Tom Thomson
,
10:26
[Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction (was RE: Som e data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses)
,
Paul Judge
,
08:31
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
08:05
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:00
Re: RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
07:38
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:11
RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Clayton, Nik [IT]
,
06:44
Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
06:10
Re: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?
,
Shannon Jacobs
,
05:59
Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
05:54
RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Clayton, Nik [IT]
,
05:49
Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
,
Shannon Jacobs
,
05:42
Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
05:36
RE: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Tom Thomson
,
05:28
Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
04:58
Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
04:47
RE: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Tom Thomson
,
04:28
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Clayton, Nik [IT]
,
04:27
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Richard Rognlie
,
03:16
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
02:39
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:11
May 20, 2003
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
23:07
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
22:14
RE: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Eric D. Williams
,
21:37
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric D. Williams
,
21:36
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric D. Williams
,
21:36
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric D. Williams
,
21:31
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric D. Williams
,
21:29
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric D. Williams
,
21:27
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:53
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
17:27
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Michael Rubel
,
16:38
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
16:19
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:43
[Asrg] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-spam-techconsider-01.txt
,
Dave Crocker
,
15:39
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Michael Rubel
,
15:11
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
13:40
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Michael Rubel
,
13:30
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
13:09
Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
12:54
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Tom Thomson
,
12:46
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Michael Rubel
,
12:14
[Asrg] MailFrontier and Patents
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
12:12
Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
11:18
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
11:07
Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
09:32
RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric Dean
,
09:11
[Asrg] Jay-Random subject line
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
08:40
Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
08:35
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric Dean
,
08:06
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric Dean
,
06:35
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
05:42
Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
05:04
Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
03:27
May 19, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Jeffrey Race
,
21:05
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric Dean
,
20:11
Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
19:51
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:48
Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
waltdnes
,
19:10
Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Jeffrey Race
,
17:13
RE: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?
,
Eric Dean
,
16:57
[Asrg] Re: C/R - What people say
,
Jason R. Mastaler
,
15:24
Re: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?
,
Justin Mason
,
15:16
Re: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?
,
Larry Marks
,
15:11
RE: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
14:57
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:53
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Barry Shein
,
14:46
[Asrg] types of spammers (was: ASRG as a source of spam?)
,
Paul Judge
,
14:44
RE: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
14:33
Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
14:16
Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Barry Shein
,
14:04
Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
,
Shannon Jacobs
,
14:02
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric Dean
,
13:54
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Eric Dean
,
13:40
Re: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?
,
Larry Marks
,
13:36
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:11
RE: [Asrg] News Article - MailBlocks, Patents and Prior Art
,
Bob Wyman
,
12:48
RE: [Asrg] News Article - MailBlocks, Patents and Prior Art
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
12:14
RE: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
12:14
RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
12:14
[Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework
,
Eric Dean
,
10:17
RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Eric Dean
,
10:06
[Asrg] News Article - MailBlocks, Patents and Prior Art
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
09:16
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:53
[Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?
,
Bob Wyman
,
08:37
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:56
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:27
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:27
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
07:27
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Alan DeKok
,
05:58
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Alan DeKok
,
05:53
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Alan DeKok
,
05:43
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:22
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:02
May 18, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Dave Crocker
,
21:36
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
20:51
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Scott Nelson
,
20:28
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:30
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:30
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Michael Rubel
,
19:13
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:10
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Scott Nelson
,
19:03
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
18:58
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:55
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Michael Rubel
,
18:20
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:06
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
18:06
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
17:30
[Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
,
Chui Tey
,
17:01
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:26
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:20
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Scott Nelson
,
15:57
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Alan DeKok
,
15:11
Re: [Asrg] List Detection
,
Dave Crocker
,
13:01
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
12:06
RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
11:58
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
11:58
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
11:49
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Fred Bacon
,
10:00
RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric Dean
,
07:35
[Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?
,
Shannon Jacobs
,
06:58
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Vernon Schryver
,
06:05
Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Jon Kyme
,
02:56
[Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
,
Kee Hinckley
,
00:37
May 17, 2003
Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Kee Hinckley
,
23:15
Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
09:42
Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
09:23
Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:42
RE: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Vernon Schryver
,
06:50
RE: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
05:30
May 16, 2003
Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Kee Hinckley
,
23:18
Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Kee Hinckley
,
21:02
Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:33
Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
17:32
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Kee Hinckley
,
17:32
Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Steve Atkins
,
17:24
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Paul Judge
,
15:30
RE: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Eric D. Williams
,
15:07
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Eric Dean
,
14:39
Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Barry Shein
,
14:31
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
14:25
RE: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Paul Judge
,
14:24
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:30
Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Steve Atkins
,
08:27
RE: [Asrg] RE: C/R Framework
,
Eric Dean
,
06:50
Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:54
May 15, 2003
Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
23:34
Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Steve Atkins
,
21:20
Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
19:55
Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
mathew
,
18:42
Re: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
mathew
,
18:39
Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam
,
mathew
,
18:30
Re: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
mathew
,
18:19
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
17:00
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
15:55
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
15:19
[Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
15:03
[Asrg] Bruce Schneier on unique email addresses...
,
Bob Wyman
,
14:30
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:05
Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam
,
Barry Shein
,
12:23
Re: RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Jon Kyme
,
11:56
Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Jon Kyme
,
11:52
Re: [Asrg] Spam is good?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
10:30
Re: [Asrg] Spam is good?
,
Steve Atkins
,
10:18
Re: RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
09:12
Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
09:11
Re: [Asrg] RE: C/R Framework
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
09:09
Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Jon Kyme
,
09:08
RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
09:04
Re: RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Jon Kyme
,
09:03
Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
08:58
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
08:54
Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
08:52
Re: RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
08:50
[Asrg] Spam is good?
,
Roy S. Walker
,
08:36
RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Eric Dean
,
08:05
[Asrg] RE: C/R Framework
,
Eric Dean
,
08:01
RE: RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Eric Dean
,
08:01
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:42
Re: RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Jon Kyme
,
07:34
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Eric Dean
,
06:42
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Eric Dean
,
06:41
RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Eric D. Williams
,
06:35
RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Eric Dean
,
06:34
Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Jon Kyme
,
03:00
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:33
May 14, 2003
[Asrg] News Article - Blacklists vs. Spam
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
22:43
Re: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Dave Crocker
,
22:34
Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
22:25
Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam
,
Tom Bartel
,
20:58
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:42
[Asrg] C/R Framework
,
Eric Dean
,
19:22
Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam
,
Barry Shein
,
19:00
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Eric Dean
,
18:02
[Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam
,
Chui Tey
,
15:48
Re: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Dave Crocker
,
14:36
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
14:25
Re: RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Jon Kyme
,
14:12
RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric Dean
,
11:06
RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
10:33
RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Tom Thomson
,
09:21
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric S. Johansson
,
08:48
RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric Dean
,
06:17
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric S. Johansson
,
05:08
RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX
,
Tom Thomson
,
03:21
RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX
,
Tom Thomson
,
03:15
Re: [Asrg] List Detection
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:21
May 13, 2003
Re: [Asrg] List Detection
,
Scott Nelson
,
21:40
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Eric Dean
,
21:21
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Vernon Schryver
,
21:13
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Eric Dean
,
19:54
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Eric Dean
,
19:51
RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric Dean
,
19:45
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
19:11
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric S. Johansson
,
18:18
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Vernon Schryver
,
17:53
Re: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Dave Crocker
,
16:59
RE: [Asrg] Suggested reply?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
16:45
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Eric Dean
,
16:04
RE: [Asrg] Suggested reply?
,
Bob Wyman
,
15:24
RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric Dean
,
14:29
[Asrg] C/R - What people say
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
14:27
RE: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER etc.
,
Barry Shein
,
13:57
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
13:38
RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
13:34
[Asrg] Suggested reply?
,
Sauer, Damon
,
13:07
[Asrg] ASRG Website
,
Paul Judge
,
12:48
RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:37
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:32
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Tom Thomson
,
12:23
RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
Tom Thomson
,
12:16
RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
11:57
Re: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX
,
Michael Rubel
,
11:54
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Tom Thomson
,
11:36
[Asrg] RE: camram/sender pays e-mail system
,
Eric Dean
,
11:35
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
11:13
[Asrg] Re: camram/sender pays e-mail system
,
Eric S. Johansson
,
11:10
RE: [Asrg] List Detection
,
Eric Dean
,
11:05
RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
10:54
RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric Dean
,
10:11
RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX
,
Eric Dean
,
09:50
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Vernon Schryver
,
09:50
[Asrg] RE: camram/sender pays e-mail system
,
Eric Dean
,
09:34
Re: [Asrg] List Detection
,
Matt Sergeant
,
09:28
RE: [Asrg] Does the group have a future?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
09:25
RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric Dean
,
08:44
[Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX
,
Tom Thomson
,
08:42
RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
Eric D. Williams
,
08:28
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
08:02
RE: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER etc.
,
Eric Dean
,
07:54
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Jon Kyme
,
07:30
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Jon Kyme
,
07:29
RE: [Asrg] camram/sender pays e-mail system
,
Eric Dean
,
06:53
RE: [Asrg] re: RFC 2076 and spam
,
Eric Dean
,
06:52
RE: [Asrg] Does the group have a future?
,
Paul Judge
,
06:49
RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
Tom Thomson
,
06:35
[Asrg] List Detection
,
Eric Dean
,
06:30
RE: [Asrg] Does the group have a future?
,
Eric Dean
,
06:17
Re: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER etc.
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
06:17
RE: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER etc.
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
05:59
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Vernon Schryver
,
05:57
RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
william
,
05:33
RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
Tom Thomson
,
05:13
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Jon Kyme
,
02:47
[Asrg] Does the group have a future?
,
Tom Thomson
,
02:22
May 12, 2003
RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric Dean
,
19:08
Re: [Asrg] C/R patents
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
17:48
Re: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
17:16
Re: [Asrg] C/R patents
,
Craig Cockburn
,
16:07
Re: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER
,
Troy Rollo
,
15:35
Re: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER
,
Art Pollard
,
15:26
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
14:55
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
14:45
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Richard Rognlie
,
14:00
Re: [Asrg] C/R patents
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
13:47
Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
13:47
RE: [Asrg] C/R patents
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
13:28
RE: [Asrg] Re: News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER - t ext included
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
13:27
[Asrg] re: RFC 2076 and spam
,
Jacob Palme
,
13:27
RE: [Asrg] C/R patents
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
13:27
Re: [Asrg] Re: News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER - text included
,
Barry Shein
,
13:00
Re: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER etc.
,
Barry Shein
,
12:59
[Asrg] camram/sender pays e-mail system
,
Eric S. Johansson
,
12:43
[Asrg] C/R patents
,
Jed Margolin
,
12:41
[Asrg] re: Using precedence and priority headers to mark spam
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
11:23
Re: [Asrg] C/R patents
,
Art Pollard
,
11:17
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
10:15
[Asrg] C/R Statistics
,
Eric Dean
,
08:51
RE: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric D. Williams
,
08:35
RE: Fwd: [Asrg] How many legitimate SMTP servers?
,
Tom Thomson
,
07:25
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
01:05
May 11, 2003
RE: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric D. Williams
,
19:30
RE: [Asrg] C/R patents
,
Eric Dean
,
19:05
Re: [Asrg] C/R patents
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
17:58
RE: [Asrg] C/R patents
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
17:37
Re: [Asrg] C/R patents
,
Scott Nelson
,
16:54
[Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
,
Eric Dean
,
16:03
RE: [Asrg] C/R patents
,
Eric Dean
,
15:48
Re: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER etc.
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:25
[Asrg] C/R patents
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
13:30
Re: [Asrg] Re: News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER - text included
,
Tony Hansen
,
13:00
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
12:55
RE: [Asrg] Seeking volunteers for C/R documents (was: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for )
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
11:57
[Asrg] Re: News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER - text included
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
10:56
[Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
10:51
RE: [Asrg] Seeking volunteers for C/R documents (was: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for )
,
John Fenley
,
10:19
Re: [Asrg] Seeking volunteers for C/R documentrs
,
Scott Nelson
,
09:58
RE: [Asrg] Call to Arms: Securing E-Mail, Controlling Spam, Empowering Users (fwd)
,
Eric Dean
,
09:48
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
09:32
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
09:22
RE: [Asrg] Seeking volunteers for C/R documents (was: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for )
,
Eric Dean
,
07:45
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
06:31
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
05:33
Re: [Asrg] WHOIS and registrars
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
05:04
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Mike Rubel
,
00:03
May 10, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
21:22
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
21:15
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Mike Rubel
,
21:06
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
21:04
Re: [Asrg] WHOIS and registrars
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
21:01
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
21:01
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
20:58
Re: [Asrg] Seeking volunteers for C/R documents (was: Washington Pos t: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for )
,
waltdnes
,
20:03
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
19:30
Re: [Asrg] Actions and Words
,
John Fenley
,
19:13
Re: [Asrg] Seeking volunteers for C/R documentrs
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:29
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
17:04
Re: [Asrg] Call to Arms: Securing E-Mail, Controlling Spam, Empowering Users (fwd)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
16:42
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Kee Hinckley
,
16:38
Re: [Asrg] Seeking volunteers for C/R documents (was: Washington Pos t: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for )
,
J C Lawrence
,
14:20
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
11:56
[Asrg] Seeking volunteers for C/R documents (was: Washington Pos t: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for )
,
Paul Judge
,
11:40
[Asrg] What's going on
,
Alan DeKok
,
11:14
Re: [Asrg] Call to Arms: Securing E-Mail, Controlling Spam, Empowering Users (fwd)
,
Alan DeKok
,
11:13
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Alan DeKok
,
11:13
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Mike Rubel
,
00:53
May 09, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Actions and Words
,
waltdnes
,
21:52
[Asrg] Spam Flitering vs. Spam Rejection
,
Justin B. Newman
,
21:08
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
waltdnes
,
20:43
Re: [Asrg] Call to Arms: Securing E-Mail, Controlling Spam, Empowering Users (fwd)
,
Alan DeKok
,
19:55
Re: [Asrg] Call to Arms: Securing E-Mail, Controlling Spam, Empowering Users (fwd)
,
Alan DeKok
,
19:51
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
19:30
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:21
RE: [Asrg] Re: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fightin
,
Eric Dean
,
18:53
RE: [Asrg] Call to Arms: Securing E-Mail, Controlling Spam, Empowering Users (fwd)
,
Eric Dean
,
18:47
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:42
RE: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
Eric Dean
,
18:39
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Barry Shein
,
17:52
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Dave Crocker
,
17:35
Re: [Asrg] Re: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fightin
,
Barry Shein
,
16:48
Re: [Asrg] Call to Arms: Securing E-Mail, Controlling Spam, Empowering Users (fwd)
,
Barry Shein
,
16:35
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
16:22
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
16:19
Re: Fwd: Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
16:04
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
Fred Bacon
,
16:03
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
15:59
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
15:57
Fwd: Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
15:24
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
15:21
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
15:02
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:58
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
14:49
RE: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:22
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
John Fenley
,
13:51
[Asrg] Law article - Legally Defining "Unauthorized" Computer Access
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
13:51
RE: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
Eric Dean
,
13:39
Fwd: Re: Fwd: [Asrg] How many legitimate SMTP servers?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
13:17
RE: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:38
RE: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
Eric Dean
,
12:31
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:06
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Alan DeKok
,
11:40
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
John Fenley
,
11:17
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
11:17
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Alan DeKok
,
10:33
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:27
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisione rs, so what?
,
Alan DeKok
,
10:23
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
10:15
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Vernon Schryver
,
09:56
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
09:53
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for
,
John Fenley
,
09:16
Re: Fwd: [Asrg] How many legitimate SMTP servers?
,
Scott Nelson
,
09:15
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
John Fenley
,
09:13
Re: [Asrg] How many legitimate SMTP servers?
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:03
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
09:01
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Jon Kyme
,
08:55
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Jon Kyme
,
08:46
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
Alan DeKok
,
08:45
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Alan DeKok
,
08:34
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Alan DeKok
,
08:24
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:09
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:43
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
07:33
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
07:29
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:25
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
william
,
07:01
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Matt Sergeant
,
06:33
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
David Walker
,
06:12
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Vernon Schryver
,
06:06
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
David Walker
,
06:04
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
05:51
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
Markus Stumpf
,
05:12
Re: [Asrg] RMX evaluation (was RE: Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats)
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
05:00
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
04:42
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
04:21
Re: [Asrg] RMX evaluation (was RE: Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats)
,
Matt Sergeant
,
03:52
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
Mike Rubel
,
02:35
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Mike Rubel
,
02:21
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
02:14
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
Mike Rubel
,
01:57
Re: [Asrg] How many legitimate SMTP servers?
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:57
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Mike Rubel
,
01:39
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
01:00
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
Mike Rubel
,
00:54
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
william
,
00:54
Re: [Asrg] RMX evaluation (was RE: Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats)
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
00:25
May 08, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
J C Lawrence
,
23:51
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
,
David Walker
,
23:31
RE: [Asrg] RMX evaluation (Monkeys vs. RMX)
,
Scott Nelson
,
23:26
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
23:22
[Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
Paul Vixie
,
21:56
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
21:56
RE: [Asrg] Joseph Melle and AOL
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
21:55
RE: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
21:55
[Asrg] Spam spoofing - data point
,
Kee Hinckley
,
21:55
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
David Walker
,
21:54
RE: [Asrg] RMX evaluation (was RE: Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats)
,
Paul Judge
,
21:47
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
21:47
RE: [Asrg] RMX evaluation (Monkeys vs. RMX)
,
Paul Judge
,
21:46
RE: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
Eric D. Williams
,
20:23
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
20:11
RE: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
20:01
Re: [Asrg] Re: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fightin
,
Claus Assmann
,
19:29
Re: [Asrg] Call to Arms: Securing E-Mail, Controlling Spam, Empowering Users (fwd)
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
19:29
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
19:20
Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
David Walker
,
18:58
Fwd: [Asrg] How many legitimate SMTP servers?
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
17:38
[Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
16:47
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Dave Crocker
,
16:36
Re: [Asrg] Joseph Melle and AOL
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:31
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
Markus Stumpf
,
15:29
[Asrg] My abscence. Webpage for topics discussed in March
,
william
,
14:45
[Asrg] How many legitimate SMTP servers?
,
Ken Hirsch
,
14:33
Re: [Asrg] Re: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fightin
,
J C Lawrence
,
14:17
Re: [Asrg] Re: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fightin
,
Barry Shein
,
14:03
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
14:03
[Asrg] Joseph Melle and AOL
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
13:44
Re: [MLIST] Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
David Walker
,
13:34
Re: [Asrg] RMX evaluation (Monkeys vs. RMX)
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
13:14
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:03
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
David Walker
,
12:53
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:34
Re: [Asrg] RMX evaluation (was RE: Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats)
,
Alan DeKok
,
12:06
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
Vernon Schryver
,
12:01
Re: Fwd: RE: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
11:54
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Vernon Schryver
,
11:53
Re: [Asrg] RMX evaluation (was RE: Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats)
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
11:53
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:53
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
11:45
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
David Walker
,
11:20
Fwd: RE: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
11:11
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Alan DeKok
,
10:58
Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
Alan DeKok
,
10:56
RE: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Scott Nelson
,
10:43
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:36
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
David Walker
,
10:32
[Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:21
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:02
RE: [Asrg] Consent, ASRG, and RMX
,
Paul Judge
,
09:36
[Asrg] RE: Request to mailing list Asrg rejected
,
Paul Judge
,
09:21
[Asrg] RMX evaluation (was RE: Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats)
,
Paul Judge
,
09:21
Re: [Asrg] Temporal properties of secondary sources
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
09:11
Re: [Asrg] Actions and Words
,
Edge, Ronald D
,
09:11
[Asrg] Consent, ASRG, and RMX
,
Alan DeKok
,
08:52
RE: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:09
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:47
RE: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Eric D. Williams
,
06:56
RE: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fighting Spam
,
Eric D. Williams
,
06:56
[Asrg] Temporal properties of secondary sources
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
05:20
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
David Walker
,
05:13
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Tom Thomson
,
04:22
RE: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Tom Thomson
,
03:51
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
00:23
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
J C Lawrence
,
00:15
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
J C Lawrence
,
00:10
May 07, 2003
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
23:44
[Asrg] Actions and Words
,
John Fenley
,
23:34
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
Michael Rubel
,
23:04
[Asrg] Call to Arms: Securing E-Mail, Controlling Spam, Empowering Users (fwd)
,
J C Lawrence
,
22:47
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Vernon Schryver
,
21:48
Re: [Asrg] Re: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fightin
,
J C Lawrence
,
20:44
[Asrg] Re: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fightin
,
John Fenley
,
20:20
Re: [Asrg] RE: Directing ASRG Activity
,
Scott Nelson
,
19:56
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
David Walker
,
19:35
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Vernon Schryver
,
18:51
Fwd: RE: [Asrg] Let's start again at the beginning...
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
18:24
RE: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
18:24
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
18:23
RE: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
18:23
RE: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
18:23
RE: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
18:23
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fighting Spam
,
waltdnes
,
18:17
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
David Walker
,
18:05
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
J C Lawrence
,
17:09
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
Michael Rubel
,
16:09
Re: [Asrg] Let's start again at the beginning...
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
16:03
RE: [Asrg] Let's start again at the beginning...
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
16:03
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fighting Spam
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
16:03
[Asrg] EarthLink to Offer Anti-Spam E-Mail System
,
Art Pollard
,
16:03
Fwd: [Asrg] RE: Directing ASRG Activity
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
15:48
Re: [Asrg] RMX and MUAs
,
Michael Rubel
,
15:37
RE: [Asrg] Let's start again at the beginning...
,
Barry Shein
,
15:24
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Barry Shein
,
15:14
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
J C Lawrence
,
14:22
Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship
,
J C Lawrence
,
14:20
Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship
,
Alan DeKok
,
14:20
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
Alan DeKok
,
13:37
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:37
Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship
,
Alan DeKok
,
13:05
Re: [Asrg] Let's start again at the beginning...
,
Alan DeKok
,
13:04
Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:45
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Tom Thomson
,
12:11
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Tom Thomson
,
12:03
Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
,
Alan DeKok
,
11:47
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
Vernon Schryver
,
11:29
RE: [Asrg] Let's start again at the beginning...
,
Eric D. Williams
,
11:27
Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:26
RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Tom Thomson
,
11:25
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:09
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Tom Thomson
,
10:50
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:40
[Asrg] Let's start again at the beginning...
,
Barry Shein
,
10:32
Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:31
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fighting Spam
,
John Fenley
,
10:27
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
10:10
Re: [Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fighting Spam
,
Jim Littlefield
,
09:53
[Asrg] Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fighting Spam
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
09:45
Re: [Asrg] RMX and MUAs
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
09:16
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:06
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough?
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:04
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
,
David Walker
,
09:00
Fwd: Re: [Asrg] Precedence headers and spam
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
08:51
Re: [Asrg] rhetoric style
,
Ken Hirsch
,
08:12
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
David Walker
,
07:49
Re: [Asrg] RMX and MUAs
,
Daniel Erat
,
07:46
[Asrg] RE: Directing ASRG Activity
,
Paul Judge
,
07:46
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
David Walker
,
07:42
Re: [Asrg] Precedence headers and spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:12
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
06:47
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
06:42
Re: [Asrg] Directing ASRG Activity
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
06:26
Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship
,
Alan DeKok
,
06:21
Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship
,
Vernon Schryver
,
06:21
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
06:07
Re: [Asrg] Directing ASRG Activity
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
05:58
[Asrg] Directing ASRG Activity
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
05:30
RE: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough?
,
Kee Hinckley
,
04:37
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Kee Hinckley
,
04:36
Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship
,
J C Lawrence
,
02:07
Re: [Asrg] rhetoric style
,
J C Lawrence
,
02:07
[Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
01:31
Re: [Asrg] rhetoric style
,
Jon Kyme
,
01:28
Re: [Asrg] RMX and MUAs
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
01:27
Re: [Asrg] rhetoric style
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
00:55
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
00:20
May 06, 2003
RE: [Asrg] RMX and MUAs
,
Eric D. Williams
,
23:52
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
23:35
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
23:22
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
23:07
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Mike Rubel
,
22:30
[Asrg] RMX and MUAs
,
Daniel Erat
,
22:25
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Mike Rubel
,
22:23
[Asrg] Originator-info header
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
21:59
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
21:42
[Asrg] Precedence headers and spam
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
21:33
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Alan DeKok
,
20:02
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
19:53
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
19:29
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:45
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
18:44
RE: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough?
,
Barry Shein
,
18:37
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:23
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:19
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:19
Re: [Asrg] RMX and aliases
,
J C Lawrence
,
18:05
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
17:37
RE: why eliminating spoofing is interesting; RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
17:27
RE: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Eric D. Williams
,
17:27
RE: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough?
,
Eric D. Williams
,
17:27
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Bob Atkinson
,
17:10
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
17:06
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Bob Atkinson
,
16:53
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
16:50
RE: [Asrg] RMX and aliases
,
Eric D. Williams
,
16:49
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
16:49
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:44
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Barry Shein
,
16:39
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication )
,
Steve Atkins
,
16:27
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
16:17
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Michael Rubel
,
16:13
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Barry Shein
,
15:55
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Damian Gerow
,
15:37
Re: why eliminating spoofing is interesting; RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Barry Shein
,
15:31
Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough?
,
Barry Shein
,
15:29
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Dave Crocker
,
15:27
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Damian Gerow
,
15:23
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Michael Rubel
,
15:20
Re: [Asrg] RMX and aliases
,
Michael Rubel
,
15:03
Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Dave Crocker
,
14:53
[Asrg] the biggest problem is ...
,
Markus Stumpf
,
14:27
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Bob Atkinson
,
14:18
Re: [Asrg] RMX and aliases
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
14:18
Re: [Asrg] RMX and aliases
,
Alan DeKok
,
14:16
Re: [Asrg] Problems with RMX
,
Ken Hirsch
,
14:03
[Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings
,
Alan DeKok
,
13:58
[Asrg] RMX example
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
13:51
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
,
13:50
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
13:48
Re: DNS record types; RE: [Asrg] Problems with RMX
,
Michael Rubel
,
13:40
[Asrg] RMX and aliases
,
bukys
,
13:40
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
13:36
DNS record types; RE: [Asrg] Problems with RMX
,
Bob Atkinson
,
13:29
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Michael Rubel
,
13:25
Re: [Asrg] Problems with RMX
,
Alan DeKok
,
13:22
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
13:20
Re: [Asrg] Problems with RMX
,
Michael Rubel
,
13:11
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Barry Shein
,
13:05
[Asrg] Problems with RMX
,
Ken Hirsch
,
12:18
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Michael Rubel
,
12:14
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Michael Rubel
,
12:09
why eliminating spoofing is interesting; RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Bob Atkinson
,
12:07
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
11:50
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Michael Rubel
,
11:50
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
11:50
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
11:35
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
11:35
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
11:32
[Asrg] Is there anything good enough?
,
Alan DeKok
,
11:29
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:24
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
10:53
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
10:50
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
10:39
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Claus Assmann
,
10:34
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:18
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
10:09
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:09
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
David Walker
,
10:08
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Steven F Siirila
,
10:07
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:03
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
09:47
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Mike Rubel
,
09:44
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
09:30
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:26
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Damian Gerow
,
09:25
Re: [Asrg] RMX and Privacy
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:24
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
09:19
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:16
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:16
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
09:14
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:13
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
09:13
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:13
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Damian Gerow
,
08:51
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
David Walker
,
08:21
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
08:14
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
08:04
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:45
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
07:04
[RANT] RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Sauer, Damon
,
06:55
[Asrg] Misunderstandings...
,
Alan DeKok
,
06:53
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
David Walker
,
06:47
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
David Walker
,
06:37
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
04:52
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems
,
Jon Kyme
,
02:18
Re: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Peter J. Holzer
,
01:53
Re: RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Jon Kyme
,
00:50
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Scott Nelson
,
00:31
May 05, 2003
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
22:53
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
22:40
Re: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Mike Rubel
,
21:34
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Mike Rubel
,
21:32
Re: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Dave Crocker
,
19:20
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:12
[Asrg] RMX and Privacy
,
Yakov Shafranovich
,
19:12
RE: reverse DNS; RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:03
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
18:03
[Asrg] Point of information?
,
Barry Shein
,
17:00
Re: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Barry Shein
,
16:07
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Michael Rubel
,
15:43
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
15:39
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
15:38
reverse DNS; RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Bob Atkinson
,
15:32
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
14:41
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
14:38
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:28
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
14:12
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:10
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:27
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
13:27
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
12:41
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
12:37
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
12:11
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
12:02
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
11:59
Re: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:51
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
11:30
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
11:28
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
11:20
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:20
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Scott Nelson
,
10:37
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:36
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:32
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Sauer, Damon
,
10:19
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:56
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:55
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
09:51
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:44
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:14
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:13
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:11
RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:10
RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:10
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
09:09
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:09
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
08:45
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
08:43
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Scott Nelson
,
08:43
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Vernon Schryver
,
08:42
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
08:26
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
08:25
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
08:21
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
08:20
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Hadmut Danisch
,
08:16
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:24
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:21
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:12
RE: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
06:37
RE: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Kee Hinckley
,
06:37
RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Kee Hinckley
,
06:37
May 04, 2003
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
23:32
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
23:21
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Mike Rubel
,
22:17
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
21:23
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
21:23
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Mike Rubel
,
19:46
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
19:28
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
19:07
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Mike Rubel
,
18:53
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Mike Rubel
,
18:33
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Scott Nelson
,
16:11
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
14:56
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
14:21
Re: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Mike Rubel
,
14:18
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Mike Rubel
,
13:30
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems
,
Jon Kyme
,
13:28
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Mike Rubel
,
12:51
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
J C Lawrence
,
12:18
RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Eric D. Williams
,
09:42
[Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:14
Re: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Alan DeKok
,
09:02
Re: [Asrg] Revised proposal
,
Ken Hirsch
,
08:38
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:39
Re: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Alan DeKok
,
07:25
Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Dave Crocker
,
07:14
May 03, 2003
RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
20:22
RE: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Olson, Margaret
,
19:35
RE: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:33
RE: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:24
RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:24
Re: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
J C Lawrence
,
15:47
[Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
,
Mike Rubel
,
15:30
[Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
,
Daniel Feenberg
,
14:53
RE: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:46
RE: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Eric D. Williams
,
14:17
RE: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Eric D. Williams
,
14:17
RE: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
10:14
RE: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Olson, Margaret
,
08:26
May 02, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
22:48
Re: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Scott Nelson
,
21:41
Re: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
19:37
RE: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Eric D. Williams
,
18:33
Re: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Vernon Schryver
,
17:40
Re: [Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Barry Shein
,
17:09
Re: [Asrg] Changing mailing lists from push to pull
,
Barry Shein
,
16:07
[Asrg] Community proposal alert...Vendor Proposes Open E-mail Standards To Fight Spam
,
Eric D. Williams
,
13:50
Re: [Asrg] Reference: Realtime UNblocking Lists
,
Andrzej Filip
,
12:10
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Larry Marks
,
12:06
Re: [Asrg] Changing mailing lists from push to pull
,
Art Pollard
,
11:25
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
11:18
Re: [Asrg] Revised proposal
,
Scott Nelson
,
10:55
Re: [Asrg] Changing mailing lists from push to pull
,
Scott Nelson
,
10:26
[Asrg] Addendum
,
Ken Hirsch
,
10:19
Re: [Asrg] Revised proposal
,
Art Pollard
,
10:07
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Scott Nelson
,
10:06
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Tom Thomson
,
09:09
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Larry Marks
,
08:56
RE: [Asrg] Changing mailing lists from push to pull
,
Eric D. Williams
,
08:39
RE: [Asrg] Reference: Realtime UNblocking Lists
,
Eric D. Williams
,
08:39
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Eric D. Williams
,
08:39
RE: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Eric D. Williams
,
08:39
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Eric D. Williams
,
08:38
[Asrg] Revised proposal
,
Ken Hirsch
,
07:33
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
06:21
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
06:21
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Markus Stumpf
,
02:59
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Tom Thomson
,
02:41
May 01, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
J C Lawrence
,
19:57
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
J C Lawrence
,
19:41
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
19:40
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
19:40
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
19:40
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
J C Lawrence
,
19:38
Re: [Asrg] Darwin's War
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:25
Re: [Asrg] at: list moderator
,
Kee Hinckley
,
19:25
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
17:18
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Barry Shein
,
16:20
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Barry Shein
,
15:59
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:43
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:31
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
15:20
RE: So what's the *right* way to be a bulkmailer? (Was RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS)
,
Barry Shein
,
15:06
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Vernon Schryver
,
14:57
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Barry Shein
,
14:46
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
David Koblas
,
14:46
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
14:24
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
14:23
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Barry Shein
,
14:02
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:52
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
13:26
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Barry Shein
,
13:26
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:25
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Vernon Schryver
,
13:10
[Asrg] Revised server whitelist proposal
,
Ken Hirsch
,
13:05
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
12:50
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
David Koblas
,
12:15
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
12:03
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Scott Nelson
,
11:39
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
J C Lawrence
,
11:10
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
10:29
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:25
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
10:19
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
10:10
Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
J C Lawrence
,
10:10
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
10:10
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
J C Lawrence
,
09:51
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
,
09:47
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Claus Assmann
,
09:28
[Asrg] FTC Anti-spam conference update - Weds 4/30 sessions
,
Dave Hendricks
,
09:04
RE: So what's the *right* way to be a bulkmailer? (Was RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / DNSBLS)
,
Dave Hendricks
,
08:57
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Jim Youll
,
08:37
Re: [Asrg] Domain-Authorized SMTP Mail
,
David Green
,
08:24
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Kee Hinckley
,
08:03
RE: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Tom Thomson
,
07:33
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Vernon Schryver
,
06:29
Re: [Asrg] Reference: Realtime UNblocking Lists
,
Andrzej Filip
,
06:06
RE: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator
,
Tom Thomson
,
03:54
Re: [Asrg] Reference: Realtime UNblocking Lists
,
Jon Kyme
,
03:15
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
02:59
[Asrg] Reference: Realtime UNblocking Lists
,
Andrzej Filip
,
02:41
Re: [Asrg] Proposal for transition to authenticated email
,
Ken Hirsch
,
01:33
April 30, 2003
Re: [Asrg] Domain-Authorized SMTP Mail
,
Jon Kyme
,
23:48
Re: [Asrg] Changing mailing lists from push to pull
,
Art Pollard
,
21:35
Re: [Asrg] Protecting Legitimate Commercial Email (was Re: ESPC P roposal)
,
Kee Hinckley
,
21:12
<
Prev Period
]
[
Next Period
>