On Thu, 8 May 2003 17:04:16 -0400
Barry Shein <bzs(_at_)world(_dot_)std(_dot_)com> wrote:
Why not just give each person a different mail address (presumably
aliased to your one true address) and use the mbox:sender pair as the
"consent token". Trivially revoked, just alias it to /dev/null.
That's essentially what consent token systems like TMAD do via plus
addresses. The advantage of the plus-address schema is that disposition
of revoked/stale/etc tokens can be various and gradated over time
(annotate, tag, renegotiate, differently file, etc). See my recent post
on a consent token protocol for ways this could be extended in a regular
fashion.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw(_at_)kanga(_dot_)nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg