No disrespect was intended. The silly quotes were not meant to refer to
anything you said but to be a general, while sarcastic, summary of the list's
response to RMX and similar schemes.
On Tuesday 06 May 2003 10:54 am, Dave Crocker wrote:
David,
When you are summarizing comments from others, please make some effort
to reflect what they actually said. Re-casting their statements into a
form that is silly and false is not especially constructive.
d/
DW> The reason RMX records haven't made a big impact to date is the lack of
a DW> standard. On this list there have been numerous proposals, each
slightly DW> different and each one has been met with silly arguments like
"if we do that DW> I won't be able to send anonymous e-mails pretending to
be Ronald Reagan" or, DW> more realistically, "but then I'd have to send my
hotmail messages actually DW> through the hotmail service and that would
suck"
DW> On Monday 05 May 2003 04:27 pm, Dave Crocker wrote:
an explanation of the real utility of rmx records has, so far, been
based on assumptions and assertions that run contrary to the user and
operations history of the Internet.
--
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg